The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in the Discovery of New Marine Natural Products from Invertebrates over the Last Two Decades – Where and What Are We Bioprospecting?
Open accessAbstract
It is acknowledged that marine invertebrates produce bioactive natural products that may be useful for developing new drugs. By exploring untapped geographical sources and/or novel groups of organisms one can maximize the search for new marine drugs to treat human diseases. The goal of this paper is to analyse the trends associated with the discovery of new marine natural products from invertebrates (NMNPI) over the last two decades. The analysis considers different taxonomical levels and geographical approaches of bioprospected species. Additionally, this research is also directed to provide new insights into less bioprospected taxa and world regions. In order to gather the information available on NMNPI, the yearly-published reviews of Marine Natural Products covering 1990-2009 were surveyed. Information on source organisms, specifically taxonomical information and collection sites, was assembled together with additional geographical information collected from the articles originally describing the new natural product. Almost 10000 NMNPI were discovered since 1990, with a pronounced increase between decades. Porifera and Cnidaria were the two dominant sources of NMNPI worldwide. The exception was polar regions where Echinodermata dominated. The majority of species that yielded the new natural products belong to only one class of each Porifera and Cnidaria phyla (Demospongiae and Anthozoa, respectively). Increased bioprospecting efforts were observed in the Pacific Ocean, particularly in Asian countries that are associated with the Japan Biodiversity Hotspot and the Kuroshio Current. Although results show comparably less NMNPI from polar regions, the number of new natural products per species is similar to that recorded for other regions. The present study provides information to future bioprospecting efforts addressing previously unexplored taxonomic groups and/or regions. We also highlight how marine invertebrates, which in some cases have no commercial value, may become highly valuable in the ongoing search for new drugs from the sea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Faulkner, D. J. (1990) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/np9900700269 · Cited by 4,866
Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas
Spalding, M. D., Fox, H. E., Allen, G. R., Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z. A., Finlayson, M., Halpern, B. S., Jorge, M. A., Lombana, A., Lourie, S. A., et al. (2007) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b570707 · Cited by 4,084
Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation
Bickford, D., Lohman, D. J., Sodhi, N. S., Ng, P. K. L., Meier, R., Winker, K., Ingram, K. K., & Das, I. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004 · Cited by 3,512
Natural products in drug discovery
Harvey, A. L. (2008) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.004 · Cited by 1,832
Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs
Roberts, C. M., McClean, C. J., Veron, J. E. N., Hawkins, J. P., Allen, G. R., McAllister, D. E., Mittermeier, C. G., Schueler, F. W., Spalding, M., Wells, F., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067728 · Cited by 1,691
Drug development from marine natural products
Molinski, T. F., Dalisay, D. S., Lievens, S. L., & Saludes, J. P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2487 · Cited by 1,186
World Register of Marine Species
Vandepitte, L., Vanhoorne, B., Decock, W., Verbeeck, A. T., Dekeyzer, S., Colpaert, S., & Hernández, F. (2013) · Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) · Cited by 1,029
Drugs from the deep: Marine natural products as drug candidates
Haefner, B. (2003) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02713-2 · Cited by 740
Biological Accommodation in the Benthic Community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica
Dayton, P. K., Robilliard, G. A., Paine, R. T., & Dayton, L. B. (1974) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942321 · Cited by 704
Cited by
Coral Reef Ecosystems under Climate Change and Ocean Acidification
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W., & Dove, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00158 · Cited by 914
Mehbub, M., Lei, J., Franco, C., & Zhang, W. (2014) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md12084539 · Cited by 417
Ecological Role of Submarine Canyons and Need for Canyon Conservation: A Review
Fernandez-Arcaya, U., Ramirez-Llodra, E., Aguzzi, J., Allcock, A. L., Davies, J. S., Dissanayake, A., Harris, P., Howell, K., Huvenne, V. A. I., Macmillan-Lawler, M., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00005 · Cited by 258
Barbosa, M., Valentão, P., & Andrade, P. (2014) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md12094934 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Leal, M. C., Puga, J., Serôdio, J., Gomes, N. C. M., & Calado, R.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-01-20
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e30580
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081836531
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 21.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in the Discovery of New Marine Natural Products from Invertebrates over the Last Two Decades – Where and What Are We Bioprospecting? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0030580
- The paper
- Leal, M. C., Puga, J., Serôdio, J., Gomes, N. C. M., & Calado, R. (2012). Trends in the Discovery of New Marine Natural Products from Invertebrates over the Last Two Decades – Where and What Are We Bioprospecting? PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.