Cited by 61Asthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Disease Management StrategiesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Describing and Quantifying Asthma Comorbidty: A Population Study

Open access
Gershon, Andrea S., Guan, Jun, Wang, Chengning, Victor, J. Charles, To, Teresa·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asthma comorbidity has been correlated with poor asthma control, increased health services use, and decreased quality of life. Managing it improves these outcomes. Little is known about the amount of different types of comorbidity associated with asthma and how they vary by age. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The authors conducted a population study using health administrative data on all individuals living in Ontario, Canada (population 12 million). Types of asthma comorbidity were quantified by comparing physician health care claims between individuals with and without asthma in each of 14 major disease categories; results were adjusted for demographic factors and other comorbidity and stratified by age. Compared to those without asthma, individuals with asthma had higher rates of comorbidity in most major disease categories. Most notably, they had about fifty percent or more physician health care claims for respiratory disease (other than asthma) in all age groups; psychiatric disorders in individuals age four and under and age 18 to 44; perinatal disorders in individuals 17 years and under, and metabolic and immunity, and hematologic disorders in children four years and under. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Asthma appears to be associated with significant rates of various types of comorbidity that vary according to age. These results can be used to develop strategies to recognize and address asthma comorbidity to improve the overall health of individuals with asthma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0034967

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asthma comorbidities are associated with worse outcomes for the patients and the healthcare systems.

    “Regardless of the etiology, it is well-known that asthma comorbidities are associated with worse outcomes for the patients and the healthcare systems (181), and managing asthma comorbidities has been associated with significant improvement in its prognosis.”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [181]

  • Managing asthma comorbidities has been associated with significant improvement in its prognosis.

    “Regardless of the etiology, it is well-known that asthma comorbidities are associated with worse outcomes for the patients and the healthcare systems (181), and managing asthma comorbidities has been associated with significant improvement in its prognosis.”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [181]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershon, A. S., Guan, J., Wang, C., Victor, J. C., & To, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Gershon, Andrea S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-05-07
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e34967
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016028728
Cited by
61
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • Government of Ontario
  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  • University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
asthma, comorbidities, respiratory diseases, mental illness, perinatal disorders, hematologic disorders, age differences, health care utilization, Ontario
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Asthma, Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review