Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacterial Communities of the Coronal Sulcus and Distal Urethra of Adolescent Males

Open access
Nelson, David E., Dong, Qunfeng, Van Der Pol, Barbara, Toh, Evelyn, Fan, Baochang, Katz, Barry P., Mi, Deming, Rong, Ruichen, Weinstock, George M., Sodergren, Erica, Fortenberry, J. Dennis·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiotas are associated with reproductive health and STI resistance in women, whereas altered microbiotas are associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV), STI risk and poor reproductive outcomes. Putative vaginal taxa have been observed in male first-catch urine, urethral swab and coronal sulcus (CS) specimens but the significance of these observations is unclear. We used 16 S rRNA sequencing to characterize the microbiota of the CS and urine collected from 18 adolescent men over three consecutive months. CS microbiotas of most participants were more stable than their urine microbiotas and the composition of CS microbiotas were strongly influenced by circumcision. BV-associated taxa, including Atopobium, Megasphaera, Mobiluncus, Prevotella and Gemella, were detected in CS specimens from sexually experienced and inexperienced participants. In contrast, urine primarily contained taxa that were not abundant in CS specimens. Lactobacilllus and Streptococcus were major urine taxa but their abundance was inversely correlated. In contrast, Sneathia, Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma were only found in urine from sexually active participants. Thus, the CS and urine support stable and distinct bacterial communities. Finally, our results suggest that the penis and the urethra can be colonized by a variety of BV-associated taxa and that some of these colonizations result from partnered sexual activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0036298

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, D. E., Dong, Q., Van Der Pol, B., Toh, E., Fan, B., Katz, B. P., Mi, D., Rong, R., Weinstock, G. M., Sodergren, E., & Fortenberry, J. D.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e36298
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062173517
Cited by
242
References
4
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Communities of the Coronal Sulcus and Distal Urethra of Adolescent Males. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0036298
The paper
Nelson, D. E., Dong, Q., Van Der Pol, B., Toh, E., Fan, B., Katz, B. P., Mi, D., Rong, R., Weinstock, G. M., Sodergren, E., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2012). Bacterial Communities of the Coronal Sulcus and Distal Urethra of Adolescent Males. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036298

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.