Cited by 298Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Evaluation of 16S rDNA-Based Community Profiling for Human Microbiome Research

Open access
Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The Human Microbiome Project will establish a reference data set for analysis of the microbiome of healthy adults by surveying multiple body sites from 300 people and generating data from over 12,000 samples. To characterize these samples, the participating sequencing centers evaluated and adopted 16S rDNA community profiling protocols for ABI 3730 and 454 FLX Titanium sequencing. In the course of establishing protocols, we examined the performance and error characteristics of each technology, and the relationship of sequence error to the utility of 16S rDNA regions for classification- and OTU-based analysis of community structure. The data production protocols used for this work are those used by the participating centers to produce 16S rDNA sequence for the Human Microbiome Project. Thus, these results can be informative for interpreting the large body of clinical 16S rDNA data produced for this project.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0039315

Cites

38 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Larkin M Osborn A Fairly D 2005 A molecular toolbox for microbial ecologists: PCR primers for functional gene analysis; Osborn A, Smith C, editors. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-06-13
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
e39315
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319405466
Cited by
297
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Broad Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN2722009000018C)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG004969, U54HG003079, U01HG004866, U54HG003273, U54HG004968, U54HG004973)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272200900018C, HHSN272200900001C, HHSN272200900008C, U54AI084844)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
16S rRNA gene, human microbiome, Human Microbiome Project, sequencing errors, community structure, reference dataset
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bayes Theorem, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review