Cited by 130Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LGR6 Is a High Affinity Receptor of R-Spondins and Potentially Functions as a Tumor Suppressor

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: LGR6 (leucine-rich repeat containing, G protein-coupled receptor 6) is a member of the rhodopsin-like seven transmembrane domain receptor superfamily with the highest homology to LGR4 and LGR5. LGR6 was found as one of the novel genes mutated in colon cancer through total exon sequencing and its promoter region is hypermethylated in 20-50% of colon cancer cases. In the skin, LGR6 marks a population of stem cells that can give rise to all cell lineages. Recently, we and others demonstrated that LGR4 and LGR5 function as receptors of R-spondins to potentiate Wnt/β-catenin signaling. However, the binding affinity and functional response of LGR6 to R-spondins, and the activity of colon cancer mutants of LGR6 have not been determined. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found that LGR6 also binds and responds to R-spondins 1-3 with high affinity to enhance Wnt/β-catenin signaling through increased LRP6 phosphorylation. Similar to LGR4 and LGR5, LGR6 is not coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins or to β-arrestin following R-spondin stimulation. Functional and expression analysis of three somatic mutations identified in colon cancer samples indicates that one mutant fails to bind and respond to R-spondin (loss-of-function), but the other two have no significant effect on receptor function. Overexpression of wild-type LGR6 in HeLa cells leads to increased cell migration following co-treatment with R-spondin1 and Wnt3a when compared to vector control cells or cells overexpressing the loss-of-function mutant. CONCLUSIONS: LGR6 is a high affinity receptor for R-spondins 1-3 and potentially functions as a tumor suppressor despite its positive effect on Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0037137

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Binding of R-spondins to LGR6 by confocal immunofluorescence analysis and competition binding assay. A&B, HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-LGR6 were incubated with mRSPO1-Fc or control conditioned media (CM) at 4°C (A), or at 37°C (B). Flag-LGR6 was detected with a Cy3-labeled anti-Flag antibody (red) and mRSPO1-Fc was detected using Alexa488-labeled anti-IgG2a antibody (green). Nuclei were counterstained with To-Pro-3 (blue). The data shown are from one of three independent experiments with similar results. C, Quantitative binding analysis using a whole-cell-based assay. HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-LGR6 were incubated with mRSPO1-Fc plus serial dilutions of purified recombinant RSPO1–4. Maximum specific binding is defined by the difference between the data with and without mRSPO1-Fc, which is ∼50% of total binding in general. All error bars are SEM (n = 3).
Figure 1 Binding of R-spondins to LGR6 by confocal immunofluorescence analysis and competition binding assay. A&B, HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-LGR6 were incubated with mRSPO1-Fc or control conditioned media (CM) at 4°C (A), or at 37°C (B). Flag-LGR6 was detected with a Cy3-labeled anti-Flag antibody (red) and mRSPO1-Fc was detected using Alexa488-labeled anti-IgG2a antibody (green). Nuclei were counterstained with To-Pro-3 (blue). The data shown are from one of three independent experiments with similar results. C, Quantitative binding analysis using a whole-cell-based assay. HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-LGR6 were incubated with mRSPO1-Fc plus serial dilutions of purified recombinant RSPO1–4. Maximum specific binding is defined by the difference between the data with and without mRSPO1-Fc, which is ∼50% of total binding in general. All error bars are SEM (n = 3).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 LGR6 enhances Wnt/β-catenin signaling in response to RSPO1–3 and this activity is inhibited by Dkk1. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with LGR6 or vector control, plus Dkk1 expression plasmids as indicated, along with the β-catenin reporter plasmid super 8× TOPFlash (firefly luciferase) and pRL-SV40 (renilla luciferase) and then stimulated with serial dilutions of purified recombinant RSPO1–2 (A), RSPO3–4 (B) or RSPO1 (C) in the presence of Wnt3a CM. Firefly luciferase activity of each well was normalized to that of renilla luciferase activity of the same well. All error bars are SEM (n = 4).
Figure 2 LGR6 enhances Wnt/β-catenin signaling in response to RSPO1–3 and this activity is inhibited by Dkk1. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with LGR6 or vector control, plus Dkk1 expression plasmids as indicated, along with the β-catenin reporter plasmid super 8× TOPFlash (firefly luciferase) and pRL-SV40 (renilla luciferase) and then stimulated with serial dilutions of purified recombinant RSPO1–2 (A), RSPO3–4 (B) or RSPO1 (C) in the presence of Wnt3a CM. Firefly luciferase activity of each well was normalized to that of renilla luciferase activity of the same well. All error bars are SEM (n = 4).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 LGR6 is not coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins or to β-arrestin following R-spondin stimulation. A, No cAMP response was detected in vector and LGR6 cells treated with RSPO1–2. B, Forksolin showed a strong stimulation of cAMP production in both cells. C, RSPO1–2 treatments had no effect on forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in vector and LGR6 cells. D, No Ca2+ mobilization was induced in vector and LGR6 cells in response to RSPO1, whereas ATP gave a robust response in both cells. E, Stimulation of LGR6 and vector cells by RSPO1 had no effect in the Gα(12/13) pathway using the serum response factor reporter enzyme assay. F, FBS gave a dose-dependent response in the serum response factor reporter enzyme assay. G, No translocation of β-arrestin was observed in LGR6 cells treated with mRSPO1-Fc, whereas colocalization of mRSPO1-Fc with LGR6 was confirmed. H, Robust translocation of β-arrestin was observed in HEK293 cells transfected with β2-adrenergic receptors and stimulated with its agonist isoproterenol.
Figure 3 LGR6 is not coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins or to β-arrestin following R-spondin stimulation. A, No cAMP response was detected in vector and LGR6 cells treated with RSPO1–2. B, Forksolin showed a strong stimulation of cAMP production in both cells. C, RSPO1–2 treatments had no effect on forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in vector and LGR6 cells. D, No Ca2+ mobilization was induced in vector and LGR6 cells in response to RSPO1, whereas ATP gave a robust response in both cells. E, Stimulation of LGR6 and vector cells by RSPO1 had no effect in the Gα(12/13) pathway using the serum response factor reporter enzyme assay. F, FBS gave a dose-dependent response in the serum response factor reporter enzyme assay. G, No translocation of β-arrestin was observed in LGR6 cells treated with mRSPO1-Fc, whereas colocalization of mRSPO1-Fc with LGR6 was confirmed. H, Robust translocation of β-arrestin was observed in HEK293 cells transfected with β2-adrenergic receptors and stimulated with its agonist isoproterenol.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Functional and binding analyses of LGR6 mutants. A, TOPFlash assay of LGR6 mutants on RSPO1-induced potentiation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with expression plasmids as indicated with a combination of super 8× TOPFlash and pRL-SV40 reporter gene constructs, and then stimulated with serial dilutions of purified recombinant RSPO1 in the presence of Wnt3a CM. All error bars are SEM (n = 4). B, Expression levels of LGR6 mutants and WT in HEK 293T cells in transient transfection paradigms. Total cell lysates were treated with Laemmli buffer for 1 hr at 37°C, fractionated by SDS-PAGE using 4–20% gels, electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and then probed with anti-Flag antibody. The signal was detected by ECL Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences). β-actin was also probed as loading control. C, Time course of changes in Wnt3a-RSPO1-induced β-catenin accumulation and LRP6 phosphorylation in vector, LGR6-WT and insGRS-overexpressing cells. HEK293 cells stably expressing vector, LGR6-WT or insGRS were stimulated with 1 ng/ml RSPO1 plus Wnt3a CM for 0–6 hrs. Total cell lysates were probed with antibodies against Flag-LGR6, phosphor-Ser1490, total LRP6, and β-actin. For the analysis of nonmembrane-bound β-catenin, the cell lysates were cleared with ConA-sepharose beads and then probed with an antibody against β-catenin as described before [9]. D, mRSPO1-Fc binding to LGR6-insGRS and WT. HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-LGR6-WT or insGRS were incubated with mRSPO1-Fc at 37°C for 1 hr. The cells were fixed, permeabilized, and then co-stained with anti-Flag (red) and anti-IgG2a (green) antibodies to detect LGR6 and mRSPO1-Fc, respectively. Nuclei (blue) were counterstained with To-Pro-3.
Figure 4 Functional and binding analyses of LGR6 mutants. A, TOPFlash assay of LGR6 mutants on RSPO1-induced potentiation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with expression plasmids as indicated with a combination of super 8× TOPFlash and pRL-SV40 reporter gene constructs, and then stimulated with serial dilutions of purified recombinant RSPO1 in the presence of Wnt3a CM. All error bars are SEM (n = 4). B, Expression levels of LGR6 mutants and WT in HEK 293T cells in transient transfection paradigms. Total cell lysates were treated with Laemmli buffer for 1 hr at 37°C, fractionated by SDS-PAGE using 4–20% gels, electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and then probed with anti-Flag antibody. The signal was detected by ECL Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences). β-actin was also probed as loading control. C, Time course of changes in Wnt3a-RSPO1-induced β-catenin accumulation and LRP6 phosphorylation in vector, LGR6-WT and insGRS-overexpressing cells. HEK293 cells stably expressing vector, LGR6-WT or insGRS were stimulated with 1 ng/ml RSPO1 plus Wnt3a CM for 0–6 hrs. Total cell lysates were probed with antibodies against Flag-LGR6, phosphor-Ser1490, total LRP6, and β-actin. For the analysis of nonmembrane-bound β-catenin, the cell lysates were cleared with ConA-sepharose beads and then probed with an antibody against β-catenin as described before [9]. D, mRSPO1-Fc binding to LGR6-insGRS and WT. HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-LGR6-WT or insGRS were incubated with mRSPO1-Fc at 37°C for 1 hr. The cells were fixed, permeabilized, and then co-stained with anti-Flag (red) and anti-IgG2a (green) antibodies to detect LGR6 and mRSPO1-Fc, respectively. Nuclei (blue) were counterstained with To-Pro-3.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Expression profiling of LGR4–6 and RSPO1–4 and migration assay of HeLa cells overexpressing LGR6. A, Expression levels of LGR4–6 in HEK293 cells and a panel of cancer cell lines determined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. B, Expression levels of RPSO1–4 in HEK293 and a panel of colon cancer cell lines determined by qPCR analysis. C, Cell migration analysis of HeLa cells stably expressing vector, LGR6-WT or insGRS after treatments with vehicle control, RSPO1,Wnt3a-CM, or RSPO1+Wnt3a. Data are presented at mean ± S.E.M. of three replicates after normalization to vehicle control. The experiment was repeated once and both showed similar results. D & E, Expression analysis of LGR6-WT and insGRS in HeLa cells by confocal immunofluorescence (D) and immunblotting (E) using an anti-Flag antibody.
Figure 5 Expression profiling of LGR4–6 and RSPO1–4 and migration assay of HeLa cells overexpressing LGR6. A, Expression levels of LGR4–6 in HEK293 cells and a panel of cancer cell lines determined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. B, Expression levels of RPSO1–4 in HEK293 and a panel of colon cancer cell lines determined by qPCR analysis. C, Cell migration analysis of HeLa cells stably expressing vector, LGR6-WT or insGRS after treatments with vehicle control, RSPO1,Wnt3a-CM, or RSPO1+Wnt3a. Data are presented at mean ± S.E.M. of three replicates after normalization to vehicle control. The experiment was repeated once and both showed similar results. D & E, Expression analysis of LGR6-WT and insGRS in HeLa cells by confocal immunofluorescence (D) and immunblotting (E) using an anti-Flag antibody.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gong, X., Carmon, K. S., Lin, Q., Thomas, A., Yi, J., & Liu, Q.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Qingyun
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-05-17
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e37137
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110651281
Cited by
129
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP100678)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
LGR6, R-spondin, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, LRP6 phosphorylation, colon cancer, tumor suppressor, loss-of-function mutations, cell migration, Wnt3a, G protein-coupled receptors, skin stem cells, promoter hypermethylation
MeSH terms
Cell Movement, Colonic Neoplasms, HeLa Cells, Humans, Mutation, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, GTP-Binding Proteins, Thrombospondins, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review