Cited by 58Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsICT in Developing Communities

In-Depth Analysis of Patient-Clinician Cell Phone Communication during the WelTel Kenya1 Antiretroviral Adherence Trial

Open access
van der Kop, Mia L., Karanja, Sarah, Thabane, Lehana, Marra, Carlo, Chung, Michael H., Gelmon, Lawrence, Kimani, Joshua, Lester, Richard T.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The WelTel Kenya1 trial demonstrated that text message support improved adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and suppression of HIV-1 RNA load. The intervention involved sending weekly messages to patients inquiring how they were doing; participants were required to respond either that they were well or that there was a problem. OBJECTIVES: 1) Describe problems participants identified through mobile phone support and reasons why participants did not respond to the messages; 2) investigate factors associated with indicating a problem and not responding; and 3) examine participant perceptions of the intervention. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of WelTel Kenya1 trial data. METHODS: Reasons participants indicated a problem or did not respond were extracted from the study log. Negative binomial regression was used to determine participant characteristics associated with indicating a problem and non-response. Data from follow-up questionnaires were used to describe participant perceptions of the intervention. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2009, 271 participants generated 11,873 responses; 377 of which indicated a problem. Health issues were the primary reason for problem responses (72%). Rural residence (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.96; 95%CI 1.19-3.25; p=0.009 and age were associated with indicating a problem (adjusted IRR 0.63 per increase in age group category; 95%CI 0.50-0.80; p<0.001). Higher educational level was associated with a decreased rate of non-response (adjusted IRR 0.81; 95%CI 0.69-0.94; p=0.005). Of participants interviewed, 62% (n=129) stated there were no barriers to the intervention; cell phone issues were the most common barrier. Benefits included reminding patients to take medication and promoting a feeling that "someone cares". CONCLUSIONS: The WelTel intervention enabled frequent communication between clinicians and patients during the WelTel Kenya1 trial. Many patients valued the service for the support it provided, with health-related concerns comprising the majority of problems identified by participants. Few sociodemographic characteristics were associated with participant engagement in the intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0046033

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Pop-Eleches C, Thirumurthy H, Habyarimana JP, Zivin JG, Goldstein MP, et al (2011) Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS 25: 825– 834. 21252632 PMC3718389

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Kop, M. L., Karanja, S., Thabane, L., Marra, C., Chung, M. H., Gelmon, L., Kimani, J., & Lester, R. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Nairobi (KE)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e46033
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126014465
Cited by
58
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5U62PS024510, U62PS024510)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
text message support, antiretroviral therapy adherence, HIV, mobile health, patient-clinician communication, barriers to intervention, participant perceptions, sociodemographic factors, rural residence, educational attainment, medication reminders
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Kenya, Male, Middle Aged, Anti-HIV Agents, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review