Cited by 91Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsMedication Adherence and Compliance

The HAART cell phone adherence trial (WelTel Kenya1): a randomized controlled trial protocol

Open access
Lester, Richard T, Mills, Edward J, Kariri, Antony, Ritvo, Paul, Chung, Michael, Jack, William, Habyarimana, James, Karanja, Sarah +10 more·2009·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives are to compare the effectiveness of cell phone-supported SMS messaging to standard care on adherence, quality of life, retention, and mortality in a population receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS AND DESIGN: A multi-site randomized controlled open-label trial. A central randomization centre provided opaque envelopes to allocate treatments. Patients initiating ART at three comprehensive care clinics in Kenya will be randomized to receive either a structured weekly SMS ('short message system' or text message) slogan (the intervention) or current standard of care support mechanisms alone (the control). Our hypothesis is that using a structured mobile phone protocol to keep in touch with patients will improve adherence to ART and other patient outcomes. Participants are evaluated at baseline, and then at six and twelve months after initiating ART. The care providers keep a weekly study log of all phone based communications with study participants. Primary outcomes are self-reported adherence to ART and suppression of HIV viral load at twelve months scheduled follow-up. Secondary outcomes are improvements in health, quality of life, social and economic factors, and retention on ART. Primary analysis is by 'intention-to-treat'. Sensitivity analysis will be used to assess per-protocol effects. Analysis of covariates will be undertaken to determine factors that contribute or deter from expected and determined outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study protocol tests whether a novel structured mobile phone intervention can positively contribute to ART management in a resource-limited setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1745-6215-10-87

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lester, R. T., Mills, E. J., Kariri, A., Ritvo, P., Chung, M., Jack, W., Habyarimana, J., Karanja, S., Barasa, S., Nguti, R., Estambale, B., Ngugi, E., Ball, T. B., Thabane, L., Kimani, J., Gelmon, L., Ackers, M., & Plummer, F. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nairobi (KE)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • York University (CA)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Health Sciences Centre (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Lester, Richard T
Venue
Trials
Published
2009-09-22
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
87-87
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166598297
Cited by
91
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
16.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi) (submittedVersion)
  • Mspace (University of Manitoba) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
antiretroviral therapy adherence, text messaging, mobile phone intervention, HIV, patient retention, viral suppression, quality of life, resource-limited settings, highly active antiretroviral therapy, patient-provider communication
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Clinical Protocols, Data Collection, Humans, Kenya, Treatment Outcome, Sample Size, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review