Cited by 6Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Impaired Eye Region Search Accuracy in Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders

Open access
Pruett, John R., Hoertel, Sarah, Constantino, John N., LaMacchia Moll, Angela, McVey, Kelly, Squire, Emma, Feczko, Eric, Povinelli, Daniel J. +1 more·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

To explore mechanisms underlying reduced fixation of eyes in autism, children with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) and typically developing children were tested in five visual search experiments: simple color feature; color-shape conjunction; face in non-face objects; mouth region; and eye region. No group differences were found for reaction time profile shapes in any of the five experiments, suggesting intact basic search mechanics in children with ASD. Contrary to early reports in the literature, but consistent with other more recent findings, we observed no superiority for conjunction search in children with ASD. Importantly, children with ASD did show reduced accuracy for eye region search (p = .005), suggesting that eyes contribute less to high-level face representations in ASD or that there is an eye region-specific disruption to attentional processes engaged by search in ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0058167

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pruett, J. R., Hoertel, S., Constantino, J. N., LaMacchia Moll, A., McVey, K., Squire, E., Feczko, E., Povinelli, D. J., & Petersen, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Pruett, John R.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-03-14
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e58167
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987028341
Cited by
6
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH079958)
  • National Eye Institute (K12EY016336, K12 EY16336)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, visual search, face perception, conjunction search, attention, children, face representation, reaction time
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Vision Disorders, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review