Cited by 131Face Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and Synchronization

Does the perception of moving eyes trigger reflexive visual orienting in autism?

Open access
Swettenham, John, Condie, Samantha, Campbell, Ruth, Milne, Elizabeth, Coleman, Mike·2003·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Does movement of the eyes in one or another direction function as an automatic attentional cue to a location of interest? Two experiments explored the directional movement of the eyes in a full face for speed of detection of an aftercoming location target in young people with autism and in control participants. Our aim was to investigate whether a low-level perceptual impairment underlies the delay in gaze following characteristic of autism. The participants' task was to detect a target appearing on the left or right of the screen either 100 ms or 800 ms after a face cue appeared with eyes averting to the left or right. Despite instructions to ignore eye-movement in the face cue, people with autism and control adolescents were quicker to detect targets that had been preceded by an eye movement cue congruent with target location compared with targets preceded by an incongruent eye movement cue. The attention shifts are thought to be reflexive because the cue was to be ignored, and because the effect was found even when cue-target duration was short (100 ms). Because (experiment two) the effect persisted even when the face was inverted, it would seem that the direction of movement of eyes can provide a powerful (involuntary) cue to a location.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2002.1203

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Swettenham et al. (2003), the cueing effects were also apparent when the face was presented upside down.

    “The effects were also apparent when the face was presented upside down.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Swettenham et al. (2003)

  • In Swettenham et al. (2003), both control and ASD groups were unable to resist following the cue given by the eyes of a face to a subsequently presented target, even though the cue was invalid 50% of the time.

    “Both their control and their ASD groups were unable to resist following the cue given by the eyes of a face to a subsequently presented target, even though the cue was invalid 50% of the time.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Swettenham et al. (2003)

  • Swettenham et al. (2003) demonstrated that reflexive orienting is intact in older children with ASD (mean age 10 years).

    “Swettenham, Condie, Campbell, Milne, and Coleman (2003) demonstrated that reflexive orienting is intact in older children with ASD (mean age 10 years).”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Swettenham et al. (2003)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychiatric Association 1994 Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders , 4th Edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Burack, J. A., Enns, J. T., Stauder, J. E. A., Mottron, L. & Randolph, B. 1997 Attention and autism: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. In Handbook of autism and developmental disorders , 2nd edn (ed. D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar), pp. 226-247. New York: Wiley.
  3. Frith, U. 1989 Autism: explaining the enigma . Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
  4. Jonides, J. 1981 Voluntary versus automatic control over mind's eye movement. In Attention and performance , vol. 9 (ed. J. Long & A. Baddely), pp. 187-203. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swettenham, J., Condie, S., Campbell, R., Milne, E., & Coleman, M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Swettenham, John
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2003-02-28
Volume
358
Issue
1430
Pages
325-334
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2153684761
Cited by
130
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, gaze following, visual orienting, reflexive attention, attentional cueing, face perception, face inversion, perceptual impairment
MeSH terms
Attention, Autistic Disorder, Child, Eye Movements, Face, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Orientation, Reflex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review