Cited by 79Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Hunger in the Absence of Caloric Restriction Improves Cognition and Attenuates Alzheimer's Disease Pathology in a Mouse Model

Open access
Dhurandhar, Emily J., Allison, David B., van Groen, Thomas, Kadish, Inga·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

It has been shown that caloric restriction (CR) delays aging and possibly delays the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We conjecture that the mechanism may involve interoceptive cues, rather than reduced energy intake per se. We determined that hunger alone, induced by a ghrelin agonist, reduces AD pathology and improves cognition in the APP-SwDI mouse model of AD. Long-term treatment with a ghrelin agonist was sufficient to improve the performance in the water maze. The treatment also reduced levels of amyloid beta (Aβ) and inflammation (microglial activation) at 6 months of age compared to the control group, similar to the effect of CR. Thus, a hunger-inducing drug attenuates AD pathology, in the absence of CR, and the neuroendocrine aspects of hunger also prevent age-related cognitive decline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0060437

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhurandhar, E. J., Allison, D. B., van Groen, T., & Kadish, I.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Kadish, Inga
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-04-02
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
e60437
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027989695
Cited by
79
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institutes of Health (NS47466)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK062710, P30DK079626)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30-NS47466, P30NS047466)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
hunger, caloric restriction, Alzheimer's disease, ghrelin agonists, amyloid-beta, microglial activation, neuroinflammation, cognitive decline, interoception, neuroendocrine signaling, aging
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cognition, Disease Models, Animal, Hunger, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Caloric Restriction, Mice, Ghrelin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review