Cited by 118Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

3D-Reconstruction of microglia and amyloid in APP23 transgenic mice: no evidence of intracellular amyloid

Stalder, M, Deller, T, Staufenbiel, M, Jucker, M·2001·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Microglia cells are closely associated with compact amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD) brains. Although activated microglia seem to play a central role in the pathogenesis of AD, mechanisms of microglial activation by beta-amyloid as well as the nature of interaction between amyloid and microglia remain poorly understood. We previously reported a close morphological association between activated microglia and congophilic amyloid plaques in the brains of APP23 transgenic mice at both the light and electron microscopic levels [25]. In the present study, we have further examined the structural relationship between microglia and amyloid deposits by using postembedding immunogold labeling, serial ultrathin sectioning, and 3-dimensional reconstruction. Although bundles of immunogold-labeled amyloid fibrils were completely engulfed by microglial cytoplasm on single sections, serial ultrathin sectioning and three-dimensional reconstruction revealed that these amyloid fibrils are connected to extracellular amyloid deposits. These data demonstrate that extracellular amyloid fibrils form a myriad of finger-like channels with the widely branched microglial cytoplasm. We conclude that in APP23 mice a role of microglia in amyloid phagocytosis and intracellular production of amyloid is unlikely.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00209-3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains unclear to what extent microglia are capable of removing amyloid from pre-existing fibrillar congophilic plaques or of preventing the deposition of smaller protofibrillar Aβ aggregates.

    “it remains unclear to what extent microglia are capable of removing amyloid from pre-existing fibrillar congophilic plaques (Stalder et al., 2001) or of preventing the deposition of smaller protofibrillar Aβ aggregates (Grathwohl et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stalder, M., Deller, T., Staufenbiel, M., & Jucker, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Jucker, M
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
427-434
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987595364
Cited by
118
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
microglia, amyloid plaques, APP23 transgenic mice, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, amyloid fibrils, microglial activation, microglial morphology, immunogold labeling, 3D reconstruction
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cytoplasm, Extracellular Space, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Microscopy, Electron, Mutation, Ultrasonography, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Microglia, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review