Cited by 86Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis Techniques

A DTI-based template-free cortical connectome study of brain maturation

Open access
Tymofiyeva, Olga, Hess, Christopher P., Ziv, Etay, Lee, Patricia N., Glass, Hannah C., Ferriero, Donna M., Barkovich, A. James, Xu, Duan·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Improved understanding of how the human brain is "wired" on a macroscale may now be possible due to the emerging field of MRI connectomics. However, mapping the rapidly developing infant brain networks poses challenges. In this study, we applied an automated template-free "baby connectome" framework using diffusion MRI to non-invasively map the structural brain networks in subjects of different ages, including premature neonates, term-born neonates, six-month-old infants, and adults. We observed increasing brain network integration and decreasing segregation with age in term-born subjects. We also explored how the equal area nodes can be grouped into modules without any prior anatomical information--an important step toward a fully network-driven registration and analysis of brain connectivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0063310

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fetal brain structural connectivity shows adult-like topological organization, including significant small-world, modular, and rich-club organization, during the middle to final trimester of gestation.

    “Many studies have discovered largely adult-like topological structures including significant small-world, modular, and rich-club organization during the middle to final trimester of gestation”

    From Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review (2022) · cites this paper as Tymofiyeva et al., 2013

    The Results (Changes in Global Topological Properties with Age) report small-world properties at all studied ages and assess modularity. But the study examined premature and term-born neonates, infants, and adults—not fetuses during gestation—and the cited passages do not establish rich-club organization or statistical significance for every claimed property. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Sporns O (2010) Networks of the brain. Cambridge: MIT Press. 424 p.
  2. [2]Hagmann P, Kurant M, Gigandet X, Thiran P, Wedeen VJ, et al (2007) Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PLoS ONE 2: e597. 17611629 PMC1895920
  3. [3]Jones DK (2010) Challenges and limitations of quantifying brain connectivity in vivo with diffusion MRI. Imaging in Medicine 2(3): 341– 355.
  4. [4]Hagmann P, Sporns O, Madan N, Cammoun L, Pienaar R, et al (2010) White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 19067– 19072. 20956328 PMC2973853
  5. [6]Fan Y, Shi F, Smith JK, Lin W, Gilmore JH, et al (2011) Brain anatomical networks in early human brain development. Neuroimage 54: 1862– 1871. 20650319 PMC3023885
  6. [8]Tymofiyeva O, Hess CP, Ziv E, Tian N, Bonifacio SL, et al (2012) Towards the “Baby Connectome”: mapping the structural connectivity of the newborn brain. PLoS ONE 7(2): e31029. 22347423 PMC3274551
  7. [9]Kaiser M (2011) A tutorial in connectome analysis: topological and spatial features of brain networks. Neuroimage 57(3): 892– 907. 21605688
  8. [10]Li Y, Liu Y, Li J, Qin W, Li K, et al (2009) Brain anatomical network and intelligence. PLoS Comput Biol 5(5): e1000395. 19492086 PMC2683575
  9. [11]Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52: 1059– 1069. 19819337
  10. [14]Zilles K, Amunts K (2010) Centenary of Brodmann’s map – conception and fate. Nat Rev Neurosci 11(2): 139– 145. 20046193
  11. [18]Batalle D, Eixarch E, Figueras F, Muñoz-Moreno E, Bargallo N, et al (2012) Altered small-world topology of structural brain networks in infants with intrauterine growth restriction and its association with later neurodevelopmental outcome. Neuroimage 60(2): 1352– 1366. 22281673
  12. [19]Mukherjee P, Berman JI, Chung SW, Hess CP, Henry RG (2008) Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: theoretic underpinnings. Am J Neuroradiol 29(4): 632– 641. 18339720 PMC7978191
  13. [20]Yan C, Gong G, Wang J, Wang D, Liu D, et al (2011) Sex- and brain size-related small-world structural cortical networks in young adults: a DTI tractography study. Cereb Cortex 21: 449– 458. 20562318
  14. [21]Lo C-Y, Wang P-N, Chou K-H, Wang J, He Y, et al (2010) Diffusion tensor tractography reveals abnormal topological organization in structural cortical networks in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 30(50): 16876– 16885. 21159959 PMC6634928
  15. [22]Gong G, Rosa-Neto P, Carbonell F, Chen ZJ, He Y, et al (2009) Age- and gender-related differences in the cortical anatomical network. J Neurosci 29: 15684– 15693. 20016083 PMC2831804
  16. [23]Cheng H, Wang Y, Sheng J, Kronenberger WG, Mathews VP, et al (2012) Characteristics and variability of structural networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 61(4): 1153– 1164. 22450298 PMC3500617
  17. [24]Bells S, Cercignani M, Deoni S, Assaf Y, Pasternak O, et al.. (2011) Tractometry–comprehensive multi-modal quantitative assessment of white matter along specific tracts. Proc. ISMRM 2011, #678.
  18. [25]Ball G, Boardman JP, Aljabar P, Pandit A, Arichi T, et al. (2012) The influence of preterm birth on the developing thalamocortical connectome. Cortex. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945212002389. [Epub ahead of print]. 22959979
  19. [27]Tymofiyeva O, Ziv E, Hess CP, Ferriero DM, Barkovich AJ, et al. Template-free brain parcellation with an optimal number of equal area nodes. Proc. OHBM 2012, #680.
  20. [28]Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2): 167– 256.
  21. [30]Scahill RI, Frost C, Jenkins R, Whitwell JL, Rossor MN, et al (2003) A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 60(7): 989– 994. 12873856
  22. [31]Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(23): 8577– 8582. 16723398 PMC1482622

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tymofiyeva, O., Hess, C. P., Ziv, E., Lee, P. N., Glass, H. C., Ferriero, D. M., Barkovich, A. J., & Xu, D.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tymofiyeva, Olga
  • Hess, Christopher P.
  • Ziv, Etay
  • Lee, Patricia N.
  • Glass, Hannah C.
  • Ferriero, Donna M.
  • Barkovich, A. James
  • Xu, Duan
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-05-13
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
e63310
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004056475
Cited by
86
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS35902)
  • University of California, San Francisco (UL1RR024131)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS35902, R01NS046432, NS46432, P50NS035902, K23NS066137)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB009756, EB009756)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024131)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD072074)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
cortical connectome, brain maturation, diffusion MRI, preterm infants, network integration and segregation, network modules, structural brain connectivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Neural Pathways, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review