Cited by 156Malaria Research and ControlMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsBiosensors and Analytical Detection

Multiplex qPCR for Detection and Absolute Quantification of Malaria

Open access
Kamau, Edwin, Alemayehu, Saba, Feghali, Karla C., Saunders, David, Ockenhouse, Christian F.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

We describe development of an absolute multiplex quantitative real-time PCR for detection of Plasmodium spp., P. falciparum and P. vivax targets in order to produce an assay amenable to high throughput but with reduced costs. Important qPCR experimental details and information that is critical to performance and reliability of assay results were investigated. Inhibition studies were performed to test and compare co-purification of PCR inhibitors in samples extracted from whole blood using either the manual or automated methods. To establish the most optimal qPCR reaction volume, volume titration of the reaction master mix was performed starting at 10 µl to 1 µl reaction master mix with 1 µl of template DNA in each reaction. As the reaction volume decreased, qPCR assays became more efficient with 1 µl reaction master mix being the most efficient. For more accurate quantification of parasites in a sample, we developed plasmid DNAs for all the three assay targets for absolute quantification. All of absolute qPCR assays performed with efficiency of more than 94%, R(2) values greater than 0.99 and the STDEV of each replicate was <0.167. Linear regression plots generated from absolute qPCR assays were used to estimate the corresponding parasite density from relative qPCR in terms of parasite/µl. One copy of plasmid DNA was established to be equivalent to 0.1 parasite/µl for Plasmodium spp. assay, 0.281 parasites for P. falciparum assay and 0.127 parasite/µl for P. vivax assay. This study demonstrates for the first time use of plasmid DNA in absolute quantification of malaria parasite. The use of plasmid DNA standard in quantification of malaria parasite will be critical as efforts are underway to harmonize molecular assays used in diagnosis of malaria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0071539

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A seasoned microscopist can discern parasitemias only above approximately 100 parasites per microliter, whereas PCR can detect 1 parasite per microliter or less.

    “A seasoned microscopist is only able to discern parasitemias above a density of approximately 100 parasites per microliter 6,7 compared with PCR where detection can occur at 1 parasite per microliter or less. 8”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamau, E., Alemayehu, S., Feghali, K. C., Saunders, D., & Ockenhouse, C. F.
Affiliations
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
  • Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (TH)
Corresponding author
Kamau, Edwin
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-08-29
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
e71539
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010146342
Cited by
156
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, multiplex real-time PCR, absolute quantification, parasite density, PCR inhibition, malaria diagnosis
MeSH terms
Humans, Malaria, Plasmodium, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Parasite Load, Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review