The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vaginal pH and Microbicidal Lactic Acid When Lactobacilli Dominate the Microbiota
Open accessAbstract
Lactic acid at sufficiently acidic pH is a potent microbicide, and lactic acid produced by vaginal lactobacilli may help protect against reproductive tract infections. However, previous observations likely underestimated healthy vaginal acidity and total lactate concentration since they failed to exclude women without a lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiota, and also did not account for the high carbon dioxide, low oxygen environment of the vagina. Fifty-six women with low (0-3) Nugent scores (indicating a lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiota) and no symptoms of reproductive tract disease or infection, provided a total of 64 cervicovaginal fluid samples using a collection method that avoided the need for sample dilution and rigorously minimized aerobic exposure. The pH of samples was measured by microelectrode immediately after collection and under a physiological vaginal concentration of CO2. Commercial enzymatic assays of total lactate and total acetate concentrations were validated for use in CVF, and compared to the more usual HPLC method. The average pH of the CVF samples was 3.5 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD), range 2.8-4.2, and the average total lactate was 1.0% ± 0.2% w/v; this is a five-fold higher average hydrogen ion concentration (lower pH) and a fivefold higher total lactate concentration than in the prior literature. The microbicidal form of lactic acid (protonated lactic acid) was therefore eleven-fold more concentrated, and a markedly more potent microbicide, than indicated by prior research. This suggests that when lactobacilli dominate the vaginal microbiota, women have significantly more lactic acid-mediated protection against infections than currently believed. Our results invite further evaluations of the prophylactic and therapeutic actions of vaginal lactic acid, whether provided in situ by endogenous lactobacilli, by probiotic lactobacilli, or by products that reinforce vaginal lactic acid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
O'Hanlon, D. E., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A. (2011) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-200 · Cited by 375
Self-citation
Cited by
The Vaginal Microenvironment: The Physiologic Role of Lactobacilli
Amabebe, E., & Anumba, D. O. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00181 · Cited by 785
The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health
Tachedjian, G., Aldunate, M., Bradshaw, C. S., & Cone, R. A. (2017) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001 · Cited by 557
Self-citationMicrobiome and Human Health: Current Understanding, Engineering, and Enabling Technologies
Aggarwal, N., Kitano, S., Puah, G. R. Y., Kittelmann, S., Hwang, I. Y., & Chang, M. W. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00431 · Cited by 508
Towards a deeper understanding of the vaginal microbiota
France, M., Alizadeh, M., Brown, S., Ma, B., & Ravel, J. (2022) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-022-01083-2 · Cited by 382
Menopause and the vaginal microbiome
Muhleisen, A. L., & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. (2016) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.05.015 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Hanlon, D. E., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-11-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e80074
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046487574
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaginal pH and Microbicidal Lactic Acid When Lactobacilli Dominate the Microbiota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0080074
- The paper
- O’Hanlon, D. E., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A. (2013). Vaginal pH and Microbicidal Lactic Acid When Lactobacilli Dominate the Microbiota. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.