The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages
Open accessAbstract
Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Proinflammatory M1 macrophages promote T helper (Th) 1 responses and show tumoricidal activity. M2 macrophages contribute to tissue repair and promote Th2 responses. CD68 and CD163 are used to identify macrophages in tissue sections. However, characterisation of polarised macrophages in situ has remained difficult. Macrophage polarisation is regulated by transcription factors, pSTAT1 and RBP-J for M1, and CMAF for M2. We reasoned that double-labelling immunohistochemistry for the detection of macrophage markers together with transcription factors may be suitable to characterise macrophage polarisation in situ. To test this hypothesis, we have studied conditions associated with Th1- and Th2-predominant immune responses: infectious mononucleosis and Crohn's disease for Th1 and allergic nasal polyps, oxyuriasis, wound healing and foreign body granulomas for predominant Th2 response. In all situations, CD163+ cells usually outnumbered CD68+ cells. Moreover, CD163+ cells, usually considered as M2 macrophages, co-expressing pSTAT1 and RBP-J were found in all conditions examined. The numbers of putative M1 macrophages were higher in Th1- than in Th2-associated diseases, while more M2 macrophages were seen in Th2- than in Th1 related disorders. In most Th1-related diseases, the balance of M1 over M2 cells was shifted towards M1 cells, while the reverse was observed for Th2-related conditions. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters: cluster I included Th1 diseases together with cases with high numbers of CD163+pSTAT1+, CD68+pSTAT1+, CD163+RBP-J+ and CD68+RBP-J+ macrophages; cluster II comprised Th2 conditions together with cases displaying high numbers of CD163+CMAF+ and CD68+CMAF+ macrophages. These results suggest that the detection of pSTAT1, RBP-J, and CMAF in the context of CD68 or CD163 expression is a suitable tool for the characterisation of macrophage polarisation in situ. Furthermore, CD163 cannot be considered a reliable M2 marker when used on its own.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas
Sica, A., & Mantovani, A. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci59643 · Cited by 6,335
Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions
Gordon, S., & Martinez, F. O. (2010) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007 · Cited by 4,197
Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling
Mantovani, A., Biswas, S. K., Galdiero, M. R., Sica, A., & Locati, M. (2013) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4133 · Cited by 2,384 · cited 3×
“There are well-established relationships between Th1 immune response and M1 polarization, as well as between Th2 response and M2 polarization [4,16,33,34].”
BackgroundOverview of the immune response
Chaplin, D. D. (2010) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.980 · Cited by 2,235
Viruses and interferon: a fight for supremacy
Katze, M. G., He, Y., & Gale, M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri888 · Cited by 1,419
Differential Roles of Macrophages in Diverse Phases of Skin Repair
Lucas, T., Waisman, A., Ranjan, R., Roes, J., Krieg, T., Müller, W., Roers, A., & Eming, S. A. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903356 · Cited by 1,205 · cited 1×
“As Th2 immune response models, 11 cecal appendices with oxyuriasis [25], 10 allergic nasal polyps with prominent eosinophilia [2,16], 10 skin biopsy samples showing wound healing [26,27] and 9 skin samples with foreign body granulomas were included [28].”
Background
Cited by
Microglial M1/M2 polarization and metabolic states
Orihuela, R., McPherson, C. A., & Harry, G. J. (2016) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.13139 · Cited by 2,070
Understanding the Mysterious M2 Macrophage through Activation Markers and Effector Mechanisms
Rőszer, T. (2015) · Mediators of Inflammation · doi:10.1155/2015/816460 · Cited by 1,762
Macrophage Polarization States in the Tumor Microenvironment
Boutilier, A. J., & Elsawa, S. F. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22136995 · Cited by 1,631
Tumor-associated macrophages: potential therapeutic strategies and future prospects in cancer
Li, C., Xu, X., Wei, S., Jiang, P., Xue, L., & Wang, J. (2021) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2020-001341 · Cited by 360
Macrophages: A review of their role in wound healing and their therapeutic use
Snyder, R. J., Lantis, J., Kirsner, R. S., Shah, V., Molyneaux, M., & Carter, M. J. (2016) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12444 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Barros, M. H. M., Hauck, F., Dreyer, J. H., Kempkes, B., & Niedobitek, G.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-11-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e80908
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060766291
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0080908
- The paper
- Barros, M. H. M., Hauck, F., Dreyer, J. H., Kempkes, B., & Niedobitek, G. (2013). Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.