The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GreenGate - A Novel, Versatile, and Efficient Cloning System for Plant Transgenesis
Open accessAbstract
Building expression constructs for transgenesis is one of the fundamental day-to-day tasks in modern biology. Traditionally it is based on a multitude of type II restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA ligase. Especially in case of long inserts and applications requiring high-throughput, this approach is limited by the number of available unique restriction sites and the need for designing individual cloning strategies for each project. Several alternative cloning systems have been developed in recent years to overcome these issues, including the type IIS enzyme based Golden Gate technique. Here we introduce our GreenGate system for rapidly assembling plant transformation constructs, which is based on the Golden Gate method. GreenGate cloning is simple and efficient since it uses only one type IIS restriction endonuclease, depends on only six types of insert modules (plant promoter, N-terminal tag, coding sequence, C-terminal tag, plant terminator and plant resistance cassette), but at the same time allows assembling several expression cassettes in one binary destination vector from a collection of pre-cloned building blocks. The system is cheap and reliable and when combined with a library of modules considerably speeds up cloning and transgene stacking for plant transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shaner, N. C., Campbell, R. E., Steinbach, P. A., Giepmans, B. N. G., Palmer, A. E., & Tsien, R. Y. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1037 · Cited by 4,619
Cited by
Bricks and blueprints: methods and standards for DNA assembly.
Casini, A., Storch, M., Baldwin, G. S., & Ellis, T. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4014 · Cited by 286
Binder, A., Lambert, J., Morbitzer, R., Popp, C., Ott, T., Lahaye, T., & Parniske, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088218 · Cited by 160
A user’s guide to golden gate cloning methods and standards
Bird, J. E., Marles-Wright, J., & Giachino, A. (2022) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.2c00355 · Cited by 135
Shuffled ATG8 interacting motifs form an ancestral bridge between UFMylation and autophagy
Picchianti, L., Sánchez de Medina Hernández, V., Zhan, N., Irwin, N. A., Groh, R., Stephani, M., Hornegger, H., Beveridge, R., Sawa‐Makarska, J., Lendl, T., et al. (2023) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2022112053 · Cited by 50
Jeblick, T., Leisen, T., Steidele, C. E., Albert, I., Müller, J., Kaiser, S., Mahler, F., Sommer, F., Keller, S., Hückelhoven, R., et al. (2023) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac476 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Lampropoulos, A., Sutikovic, Z., Wenzl, C., Maegele, I., Lohmann, J. U., & Forner, J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-12-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e83043
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062893362
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GreenGate - A Novel, Versatile, and Efficient Cloning System for Plant Transgenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0083043
- The paper
- Lampropoulos, A., Sutikovic, Z., Wenzl, C., Maegele, I., Lohmann, J. U., & Forner, J. (2013). GreenGate - A Novel, Versatile, and Efficient Cloning System for Plant Transgenesis. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.