Cited by 135CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBiochemical and Structural Characterization

A user’s guide to golden gate cloning methods and standards

Open access
Bird, Jasmine E., Marles-Wright, Jon, Giachino, Andrea·2022·ACS Synthetic Biology

Abstract

The continual demand for specialized molecular cloning techniques that suit a broad range of applications has driven the development of many different cloning strategies. One method that has gained significant traction is Golden Gate assembly, which achieves hierarchical assembly of DNA parts by utilizing Type IIS restriction enzymes to produce user-specified sticky ends on cut DNA fragments. This technique has been modularized and standardized, and includes different subfamilies of methods, the most widely adopted of which are the MoClo and Golden Braid standards. Moreover, specialized toolboxes tailored to specific applications or organisms are also available. Still, the quantity and range of assembly methods can constitute a barrier to adoption for new users, and even experienced scientists might find it difficult to discern which tools are best suited toward their goals. In this review, we provide a beginner-friendly guide to Golden Gate assembly, compare the different available standards, and detail the specific features and quirks of commonly used toolboxes. We also provide an update on the state-of-the-art in Golden Gate technology, discussing recent advances and challenges to inform existing users and promote standard practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00355

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shuttle vectors used by the authors include BsaI restriction sites that are compatible with modular Golden Gate cloning.

    “the shuttle vectors used by the authors include BsaI restriction sites that are compatible with modular Golden Gate cloning.4”

    From Protocol for the transformation and engineering of edible algae Arthrospira platensis to generate heterologous protein-expressing strains (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Hierarchical Assembly section says that GoldenBraid part vectors contain BsaI recognition sites, supporting the general compatibility of BsaI sites with modular Golden Gate cloning. The paper does not identify or describe the specific shuttle vectors used by the citing authors, so it cannot establish that those vectors contain BsaI sites. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bird, J. E., Marles-Wright, J., & Giachino, A.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
  • University of Salford (GB)
Venue
ACS Synthetic Biology
Published
2022-11-02
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
3551-3563
ISSN
2161-5063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307925826
Cited by
135
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Synthetic Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministry of Defence
  • Research Councils UK (BB/N005570/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
Golden Gate assembly, type IIS restriction enzymes, modular cloning, sticky ends
MeSH terms
Cloning, Molecular, DNA, DNA Restriction Enzymes, Genetic Vectors, Synthetic Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review