Cited by 54Sparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesAdrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and Cortisol

Deconvolution of Serum Cortisol Levels by Using Compressed Sensing

Open access
Faghih, Rose T., Dahleh, Munther A., Adler, Gail K., Klerman, Elizabeth B., Brown, Emery N.·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The pulsatile release of cortisol from the adrenal glands is controlled by a hierarchical system that involves corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) from the hypothalamus, adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary, and cortisol from the adrenal glands. Determining the number, timing, and amplitude of the cortisol secretory events and recovering the infusion and clearance rates from serial measurements of serum cortisol levels is a challenging problem. Despite many years of work on this problem, a complete satisfactory solution has been elusive. We formulate this question as a non-convex optimization problem, and solve it using a coordinate descent algorithm that has a principled combination of (i) compressed sensing for recovering the amplitude and timing of the secretory events, and (ii) generalized cross validation for choosing the regularization parameter. Using only the observed serum cortisol levels, we model cortisol secretion from the adrenal glands using a second-order linear differential equation with pulsatile inputs that represent cortisol pulses released in response to pulses of ACTH. Using our algorithm and the assumption that the number of pulses is between 15 to 22 pulses over 24 hours, we successfully deconvolve both simulated datasets and actual 24-hr serum cortisol datasets sampled every 10 minutes from 10 healthy women. Assuming a one-minute resolution for the secretory events, we obtain physiologically plausible timings and amplitudes of each cortisol secretory event with R (2) above 0.92. Identification of the amplitude and timing of pulsatile hormone release allows (i) quantifying of normal and abnormal secretion patterns towards the goal of understanding pathological neuroendocrine states, and (ii) potentially designing optimal approaches for treating hormonal disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0085204

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed architecture has been previously verified for cortisol in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia syndromes.

    “The proposed architecture has been previously verified for cortisol in healthy subjects and also on patients suffering from chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia syndromes (32–34).”

    From Sparse System Identification of Leptin Dynamics in Women With Obesity (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Methods (Experiment; page not provided) describe cortisol measurements from 10 healthy women, and the Results report that the model captured their cortisol dynamics. The women were healthy controls for a separate fibromyalgia study; this paper does not report testing the method in patients with fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Because the approach had been previously examined for cortisol data in different studies, it was not validated on simulated data.

    “As this approach has been previously examined for cortisol data in different studies, we do not validate it on simulated data (33, 34, 38).”
  • The cortisol secretion model used in this research was provided by Faghih et al.

    “In this research, we use the cortisol secretion model provided by Faghih et al. (33).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Kettyle WM, Arky RA (1998) Endocrine Pathophysiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
  2. [19]Murray JF (2005) Visual recognition, inference and coding using learned sparse overcomplete representations. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faghih, R. T., Dahleh, M. A., Adler, G. K., Klerman, E. B., & Brown, E. N.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Faghih, Rose T.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e85204
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144190916
Cited by
54
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0735956, 0836720, NCC 9-58)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA NCC 9‐58, HFP02802, NCC958, RC2-HL101340)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NASA NCC 9‐58, HFP-02802, NCC 9‐58, HFP01603)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-HL-11408, DP1OD003646, R01GM, HFP01603, 5rc2hl101340-02, NIH K24, NCC9-58, HFP02802, RC2-HL101340, AG09975)
  • National Institute on Aging (Z01AG000661, K01-AG00661, NIH P01-AG09975, P01AG009975, K01AG000661)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RC2- HL101340, K24HL105664, R01HL114088, NIH K24 HL103845, R01-HL-11408, K24HL103845)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM53559, R01GM053559)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR043130, NIH R01AR43130)
  • National Center for Research Resources (L30 RR020635, UL1RR025758, M01RR20635, M01RR002635)
  • Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
cortisol secretion, pulsatile hormone secretion, compressed sensing, deconvolution, ACTH, non-convex optimization, coordinate descent, generalized cross-validation, regularization parameter selection, adrenal gland, neuroendocrine regulation
MeSH terms
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Adult, Algorithms, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review