The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Widespread Use and Frequent Detection of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Wetlands of Canada's Prairie Pothole Region
Open accessAbstract
Neonicotinoids currently dominate the insecticide market as seed treatments on Canada's major Prairie crops (e.g., canola).The potential impact to ecologically significant wetlands in this dominantly agro-environment has largely been overlooked while the distribution of use, incidence and level of contamination remains unreported.We modelled the spatial distribution of neonicotinoid use across the three Prairie Provinces in combination with temporal assessments of water and sediment concentrations in wetlands to measure four active ingredients (clothianidin, thiamethoxam, imidacloprid and acetamiprid).From 2009 to 2012, neonicotinoid use was increasing; by 2012, applications covered an estimated ,11 million hectares (44% of Prairie cropland) with .216,000kg of active ingredients.Thiamethoxam, followed by clothianidin, were the dominant seed treatments by mass and area.Areas of high neonicotinoid use were identified as high density canola or soybean production.Water sampled four times from 136 wetlands (spring, summer, fall 2012 and spring 2013) across four rural municipalities in Saskatchewan similarly revealed clothianidin and thiamethoxam in the majority of samples.In spring 2012 prior to seeding, 36% of wetlands contained at least one neonicotinoid.Detections increased to 62% in summer 2012, declined to 16% in fall, and increased to 91% the following spring 2013 after ice-off.Peak concentrations were recorded during summer 2012 for both thiamethoxam (range: ,LOQ -1490 ng/L, canola) and clothianidin (range: ,LOQ -3110 ng/ L, canola).Sediment samples collected during the same period rarely (6%) contained neonicotinoid concentrations (which did not exceed 20 ng/L).Wetlands situated in barley, canola and oat fields consistently contained higher mean concentrations of neonicotinoids than in grasslands, but no individual crop singularly influenced overall detections or concentrations.Distribution maps indicate neonicotinoid use is increasing and becoming more widespread with concerns for environmental loading, while frequently detected neonicotinoid concentrations in Prairie wetlands suggest high persistence and transport into wetlands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Akaike, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294359 · Cited by 5,264
Akaike, H. (1987) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29 · Cited by 4,027
Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for Neonicotinoids
Jeschke, P., Nauen, R., Schindler, M., & Elbert, A. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101303g · Cited by 1,867
NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDE TOXICOLOGY: Mechanisms of Selective Action
Tomizawa, M., & Casida, J. E. (2005) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095930 · Cited by 1,741
Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world
Erwin, K. L. (2009) · Wetlands Ecology and Management · doi:10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1 · Cited by 1,305
Neonicotinoid Pesticide Reduces Bumble Bee Colony Growth and Queen Production
Whitehorn, P. R., O’Connor, S., Wackers, F. L., & Goulson, D. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215025 · Cited by 1,290
A Primer of Ecological Statistics
Gotelli, N. J., & Ellison, A. M. (2004) · Cited by 1,237
Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment
Blacquière, T., Smagghe, G., van Gestel, C. A. M., & Mommaerts, V. (2012) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x · Cited by 1,039
Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection
Elbert, A., Haas, M., Springer, B., Thielert, W., & Nauen, R. (2008) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1616 · Cited by 953
Multiple Routes of Pesticide Exposure for Honey Bees Living Near Agricultural Fields
Krupke, C. H., Hunt, G. J., Eitzer, B. D., Andino, G., & Given, K. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029268 · Cited by 871
Cited by
Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil
Bonmatin, J.-M., Giorio, C., Girolami, V., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D. P., Krupke, C., Liess, M., Long, E., Marzaro, M., Mitchell, E. A. D., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7 · Cited by 1,372
Hladik, M. L., Kolpin, D. W., & Kuivila, K. M. (2014) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.033 · Cited by 407
First National-Scale Reconnaissance of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Streams across the USA
Hladik, M. L., & Kolpin, D. W. (2016) · Environmental Chemistry · doi:10.1071/en15061 · Cited by 251
Sadaria, A. M., Supowit, S. D., & Halden, R. U. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01032 · Cited by 185
Papiernik, S. K., Sappington, T. W., Luttrell, R. G., Hesler, L. S., & Allen, K. C. (2018) · Journal of Integrated Pest Management · doi:10.1093/jipm/pmx026 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Main, A. R., Headley, J. V., Peru, K. M., Michel, N. L., Cessna, A. J., & Morrissey, C. A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-03-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e92821
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160480407
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Widespread Use and Frequent Detection of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Wetlands of Canada's Prairie Pothole Region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0092821
- The paper
- Main, A. R., Headley, J. V., Peru, K. M., Michel, N. L., Cessna, A. J., & Morrissey, C. A. (2014). Widespread Use and Frequent Detection of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Wetlands of Canada's Prairie Pothole Region. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.