Cited by 32Health and Medical Research Impactsscientometrics and bibliometrics researchResearch, Science, and Academia

Comparing Cutaneous Research Funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases with 2010 Global Burden of Disease Results

Open access
Karimkhani, Chante, Boyers, Lindsay N., Margolis, David J., Naghavi, Mohsen, Hay, Roderick J., Williams, Hywel C., Naldi, Luigi, Coffeng, Luc E. +6 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Disease burden data helps guide research prioritization. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which grants issued by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) reflect disease burden, measured by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 project. DESIGN: Two investigators independently assessed 15 skin conditions studied by GBD 2010 in the NIAMS database for grants issued in 2013. The 15 skin diseases were matched to their respective DALYs from GBD 2010. SETTING: The United States NIAMS database and GBD 2010 skin condition disability data. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): Relationship of NIAMS grant database topic funding with percent total GBD 2010 DALY and DALY rank for 15 skin conditions. RESULTS: During fiscal year 2013, 1,443 NIAMS grants were issued at a total value of $424 million. Of these grants, 17.7% covered skin topics. Of the total skin disease funding, 82% (91 grants) were categorized as "general cutaneous research." Psoriasis, leprosy, and "other skin and subcutaneous diseases" (ie; immunobullous disorders, vitiligo, and hidradenitis suppurativa) were over-represented when funding was compared with disability. Conversely, cellulitis, decubitus ulcer, urticaria, acne vulgaris, viral skin diseases, fungal skin diseases, scabies, and melanoma were under-represented. Conditions for which disability and funding appeared well-matched were dermatitis, squamous and basal cell carcinoma, pruritus, bacterial skin diseases, and alopecia areata. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Degree of representation in NIAMS is partly correlated with DALY metrics. Grant funding was well-matched with disability metrics for five of the 15 studied skin diseases, while two skin diseases were over-represented and seven were under-represented. Global burden estimates provide increasingly transparent and important information for investigating and prioritizing national research funding allocations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0102122

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When NIH funding was compared with the relative disability burden of skin conditions, seven skin diseases (cellulitis, decubitus ulcer, urticaria, acne vulgaris, viral skin diseases, fungal skin diseases, scabies, and melanoma) were underrepresented.

    “When the amount of NIH funding was compared with the relative disability burden of skin conditions, seven skin diseases (cellulitis, decubitus ulcer, urticaria, acne vulgaris, viral skin diseases, fungal skin diseases, scabies, and melanoma) were underrepresented”

    From Global Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

  • There remains a mismatch between resource allocation and the skin diseases with the greatest disability burden, both in grant funding and systematic reviews.

    “There remains a mismatch between resource allocation and the skin diseases with the greatest disability burden – both in grant funding and systematic reviews”

    From Global Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karimkhani, C., Boyers, L. N., Margolis, D. J., Naghavi, M., Hay, R. J., Williams, H. C., Naldi, L., Coffeng, L. E., Weinstock, M. A., Dunnick, C. A., Pederson, H., Vos, T., Murray, C. J. L., & Dellavalle, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT)
  • Brown University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Dellavalle, Robert P.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-07-08
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
e102122
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121910794
Cited by
32
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10246)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
skin diseases, research funding, disability-adjusted life years, global burden of disease, research prioritization, psoriasis, leprosy, vitiligo, hidradenitis suppurativa, melanoma, pressure ulcers, urticaria, acne, fungal skin infection, scabies, bacterial skin infections, skin inflammation, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, alopecia areata, pruritus
MeSH terms
Female, Financing, Government, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Male, Skin Diseases, United States, Global Health, Cost of Illness, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Biomedical Research, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U.S.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review