The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lactobacilli Inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis through Lactic Acid but Not H2O2
Open accessAbstract
Lactobacillus species dominate the microbiome in the lower genital tract of most reproductive-age women. Producing lactic acid and H2O2, lactobacilli are believed to play an important role in prevention of colonization by and growth of pathogens. However, to date, there have been no reported studies characterizing how lactobacilli interact with Chlamydia trachomatis, a leading sexually transmitted bacterium. In this report, we demonstrate inactivation of C. trachomatis infectivity by culture media conditioned by Lactobacillus crispatus, L. gasseri and L. jensenii, known to be dominating organisms in the human vaginal microbiome. Lactobacillus still cultures produced lactic acid, leading to time- and concentration-dependent killing of C. trachomatis. Neutralization of the acidic media completely reversed chlamydia killing. Addition of lactic acid into Lactobacillus-unconditioned growth medium recapitulated the chlamydiacidal activity of conditioned media. The H2O2 concentrations in the still cultures were found to be comparable to those reported for the cervicovaginal fluid, but insufficient to inactivate chlamydiae. Aeration of Lactobacillus cultures by shaking markedly induced H2O2 production, but strongly inhibited Lactobacillus growth and lactic acid production, and thus severely affected acidification, leading to significantly reduced chlamydiacidal efficiency. These observations indicate lactobacilli inactivate chlamydiae primarily through maintaining acidity in a relatively hypoxic environment in the vaginal lumen with limited H2O2, which is consistent with the notion that women with higher vaginal pH are more prone to sexually transmitted C. trachomatis infection. In addition to lactic acid, formic acid and acetic acid also exhibited potent chlamydiacidal activities. Taken together, our findings imply that lowering the vaginal pH through engineering of the vaginal microbiome and other means will make women less susceptible to C. trachomatis infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
O'Hanlon, D. E., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A. (2011) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-200 · Cited by 375
Cited by
The Vaginal Microenvironment: The Physiologic Role of Lactobacilli
Amabebe, E., & Anumba, D. O. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00181 · Cited by 785
Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health
Chee, W. J. Y., Chew, S. Y., & Than, L. T. L. (2020) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-020-01464-4 · Cited by 657
The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health
Tachedjian, G., Aldunate, M., Bradshaw, C. S., & Cone, R. A. (2017) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001 · Cited by 557
Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health
Petrova, M. I., Lievens, E., Malik, S., Imholz, N., & Lebeer, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2015.00081 · Cited by 523
Mitra, A., MacIntyre, D. A., Marchesi, J. R., Lee, Y. S., Bennett, P. R., & Kyrgiou, M. (2016) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0203-0 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, Z., Luna, Y., Yu, P., & Fan, H.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-09-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e107758
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042515647
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactobacilli Inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis through Lactic Acid but Not H2O2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0107758
- The paper
- Gong, Z., Luna, Y., Yu, P., & Fan, H. (2014). Lactobacilli Inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis through Lactic Acid but Not H2O2. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.