The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Implicit and Explicit Measures of the Sense of Agency Measure the Same Thing?
Open accessAbstract
The sense of agency (SoA) refers to perceived causality of the self, i.e. the feeling of causing something to happen. The SoA has been probed using a variety of explicit and implicit measures. Explicit measures include rating scales and questionnaires. Implicit measures, which include sensory attenuation and temporal binding, use perceptual differences between self- and externally generated stimuli as measures of the SoA. In the present study, we investigated whether the different measures tap into the same self-attribution processes by determining whether individual differences on implicit and explicit measures of SoA are correlated. Participants performed tasks in which they triggered tones via key presses (operant condition) or passively listened to tones triggered by a computer (observational condition). We replicated previously reported effects of sensory attenuation and temporal binding. Surprisingly the two implicit measures of SoA were not significantly correlated with each other, nor did they correlate with the explicit measures of SoA. Our results suggest that some explicit and implicit measures of the SoA may tap into different processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
LIBET, B., GLEASON, C. A., WRIGHT, E. W., & PEARL, D. K. (1983) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/106.3.623 · Cited by 2,498
The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework
Pacherie, E. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003 · Cited by 618
Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences
Voss, M., Moore, J., Hauser, M., Gallinat, J., Heinz, A., & Haggard, P. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq152 · Cited by 366
Effect of Distorted Visual Feedback on the Sense of Agency
Farrer, C., Bouchereau, M., Jeannerod, M., & Franck, N. (2008) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2008/425267 · Cited by 186
A New Look at Sensory Attenuation: Action-Effect Anticipation Affects Sensitivity, Not Response Bias
Cardoso-Leite, P., Mamassian, P., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Waszak, F. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610389187 · Cited by 166
Cited by
Sense of agency in the human brain
Haggard, P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.14 · Cited by 1,107
Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency
Beck, B., Di Costa, S., & Haggard, P. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.002 · Cited by 104
van der Weiden, A., Prikken, M., & van Haren, N. E. M. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.004 · Cited by 101
Berlin (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.11.002 · Cited by 44
Feeling in Control: The Role of Cardiac Timing in the Sense of Agency
Herman, A. M., & Tsakiris, M. (2020) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-020-00013-x · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewey, J. A., & Knoblich, G.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e110118
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078975280
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.