Cited by 104Free Will and AgencyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency

Open access
Beck, Brianna, Di Costa, Steven, Haggard, Patrick·2017·Cognition

Abstract

The sense of agency refers to the feeling of control over one's actions, and, through them, over external events. One proposed marker of implicit sense of agency is 'intentional binding'-the tendency to perceive voluntary actions and their outcomes as close in time. Another is attenuation of the sensory consequences of a voluntary action. Here we show that the ability to choose an outcome through action selection contributes to implicit sense of agency. We measured intentional binding and stimulus intensity ratings using painful and non-painful somatosensory outcomes. In one condition, participants chose between two actions with different probabilities of producing high or low intensity outcomes, so action choices were meaningful. In another condition, action selection was meaningless with respect to the outcome. Having control over the outcome increased binding, especially when outcomes were painful. Greater sensory attenuation also tended to be associated with stronger binding of the outcome towards the action that produced it. Previous studies have emphasised the link between sense of agency and initiation of voluntary motor actions. Our study shows that the ability to control outcomes by discriminative action selection is another key element of implicit sense of agency. It also investigates, for the first time, the relation between binding and sensory attenuation for the same events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.002

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, B., Di Costa, S., & Haggard, P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Haggard, Patrick
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
162
Pages
54-60
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587815713
Cited by
104
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • EU (257695)
  • ERC Advanced Grant HUMVOL
  • UCL PhD demonstratorship
  • ESRC Professorial Fellowship (ES/J023140/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
sense of agency, intentional binding, sensory attenuation, action selection, outcome control, voluntary action, pain perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Choice Behavior, Electroshock, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Pain, Psychomotor Performance, Time Perception, Self Efficacy, Intention, Young Adult, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review