Cited by 157Nutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseSodium Intake and HealthNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disclosure of Genetic Information and Change in Dietary Intake: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Nielsen, Daiva E., El-Sohemy, Ahmed·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proponents of consumer genetic tests claim that the information can positively impact health behaviors and aid in chronic disease prevention. However, the effects of disclosing genetic information on dietary intake behavior are not clear. METHODS: A double-blinded, parallel group, 2:1 online randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the short- and long-term effects of disclosing nutrition-related genetic information for personalized nutrition on dietary intakes of caffeine, vitamin C, added sugars, and sodium. Participants were healthy men and women aged 20-35 years (n = 138). The intervention group (n = 92) received personalized DNA-based dietary advice for 12-months and the control group (n = 46) received general dietary recommendations with no genetic information for 12-months. Food frequency questionnaires were collected at baseline and 3- and 12-months after the intervention to assess dietary intakes. General linear models were used to compare changes in intakes between those receiving general dietary advice and those receiving DNA-based dietary advice. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, no significant changes to dietary intakes of the nutrients were observed at 3-months. At 12-months, participants in the intervention group who possessed a risk version of the ACE gene, and were advised to limit their sodium intake, significantly reduced their sodium intake (mg/day) compared to the control group (-287.3 ± 114.1 vs. 129.8 ± 118.2, p = 0.008). Those who had the non-risk version of ACE did not significantly change their sodium intake compared to the control group (12-months: -244.2 ± 150.2, p = 0.11). Among those with the risk version of the ACE gene, the proportion who met the targeted recommendation of 1500 mg/day increased from 19% at baseline to 34% after 12 months (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that disclosing genetic information for personalized nutrition results in greater changes in intake for some dietary components compared to general population-based dietary advice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01353014.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0112665

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) diagram and subject flow through the trial.
Figure 1 Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) diagram and subject flow through the trial.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Research Council (2006) Dietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–157 of 157

Metadata

Authors
Nielsen, D. E., & El-Sohemy, A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-11-14
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
e112665
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989879035
Cited by
157
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Advanced Foods and Materials Network
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (89829_1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
genetic information disclosure, consumer genetic testing, personalized nutrition, ACE gene, sodium intake, caffeine consumption, vitamin C intake, added sugars, chronic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Linear Models, Disclosure, Nutrigenomics, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review