Cited by 1,919Data Analysis with RMultidisciplinary Science and Engineering ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations

Open access
Diedenhofen, Birk, Musch, Jochen·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

A valid comparison of the magnitude of two correlations requires researchers to directly contrast the correlations using an appropriate statistical test. In many popular statistics packages, however, tests for the significance of the difference between correlations are missing. To close this gap, we introduce cocor, a free software package for the R programming language. The cocor package covers a broad range of tests including the comparisons of independent and dependent correlations with either overlapping or nonoverlapping variables. The package also includes an implementation of Zou's confidence interval for all of these comparisons. The platform independent cocor package enhances the R statistical computing environment and is available for scripting. Two different graphical user interfaces-a plugin for RKWard and a web interface-make cocor a convenient and user-friendly tool.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0121945

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ψ and m1ψ substitutions for U have been widely adopted for mRNA therapeutics and vaccines due to improved in-cell translation and better control of innate immune responses.

    “In particular, we focused on ψ and m1ψ, since these substitutions for U have been widely adopted for mRNA therapeutics and vaccines due to improved in-cell translation and to better control of innate immune responses2,3,8,67 through avoidance of recognition by cellular toll-like receptors (TLR7 and TLR8)68, RIG‑I, and PKR69–71.”

    From Combinatorial optimization of mRNA structure, stability, and translation for RNA-based therapeutics (2022) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Introduction and Code Examples discuss statistical tests for comparing correlations, not mRNA therapeutics or vaccines. The supplied passages do not address ψ or m1ψ substitutions, translation, or innate immune responses, so our copy provides no evidence for the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]Baguley T. Serious Stats: A Guide to Advanced Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
  2. [4]Larson R, Farber B. Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2011.
  3. [6]Rousselet GA, Pernet CR. Improving Standards in Brain-Behavior Correlation Analyses. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6: 1– 11. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00119 22563313 PMC3342588 · DOI
  4. [8]Rosnow RL, Rosenthal R. Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science. Am Psychol. 1989; 44: 1276– 1284. 10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276 · DOI
  5. [9]May K, Hittner JB. Tests for Comparing Dependent Correlations Revisited: A Monte Carlo Study. J Exp Educ. 1997; 65: 257– 269. 10.1080/00220973.1997.9943458 · DOI
  6. [10]Dunn OJ, Clark VA. Comparison of Tests of the Equality of Dependent Correlation Coefficients. J Am Stat Assoc. 1971; 66: 904– 908. 10.1080/01621459.1971.10482369 · DOI
  7. [11]Hittner JB, May K, Silver NC. A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Tests for Comparing Dependent Correlations. J Gen Psychol. 2003; 130: 149– 168. 10.1080/00221300309601282 12773018 · DOI
  8. [12]Neill JJ, Dunn OJ. Equality of Dependent Correlation Coefficients. Biometrics. 1975; 31: 531– 543. 10.2307/2529435 · DOI
  9. [14]Raghunathan TE, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB. Comparing Correlated but Nonoverlapping Correlations. Psychol Methods. 1996; 1: 178– 183. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.178 · DOI
  10. [15]Silver NC, Hittner JB, May K. Testing Dependent Correlations with Nonoverlapping Variables: A Monte Carlo Simulation. J Exp Educ. 2004; 73: 53– 69. 10.3200/JEXE.71.1.53-70 · DOI
  11. [16]Zou GY. Toward Using Confidence Intervals to Compare Correlations. Psychol Methods. 2007; 12: 399– 413. 10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.399 18179351 · DOI
  12. [18]Olkin I, Finn JD. Correlation Redux. Psychol Bull. 1995; 118: 155– 164. 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.155 · DOI
  13. [19]Wilcox RR. Comparing Pearson Correlations: Dealing with Heteroscedasticity and Nonnormality. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2009; 38: 2220– 2234. 10.1080/03610910903289151 · DOI
  14. [21]Pearson K, Filon LNG. Mathematical Contributions to Theory of Evolution: IV. On the Probable Errors of Frequency Constants and on the Influence of Random Selection and Correlation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A. 1898; 191: 229– 311.
  15. [22]Hotelling H. The Selection of Variates for Use in Prediction, with Some Comments on the General Problem of Nuisance Parameters. Ann Math Stat. 1940; 11: 271– 283. 10.1214/aoms/1177731867 · DOI
  16. [23]Williams EJ. The Comparison of Regression Variables. J R Stat Soc B. 1959; 21: 396– 399. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983809. Accessed 21 February 2015.
  17. [24]Olkin I. Correlations Revisited In: Stanley JC, editor. Improving Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1967 pp. 102– 128.
  18. [25]Dunn OJ, Clark VA. Correlation Coefficients Measured on the Same Individuals. J Am Stat Assoc. 1969; 64: 366– 377. 10.1080/01621459.1969.10500981 · DOI
  19. [26]Hendrickson GF, Stanley JC, Hills JR. Olkin’s New Formula for Significance of r13 vs. r23 Compared with Hotelling’s Method. Am Educ Res J. 1970; 7: 189– 195. 10.2307/1162159 · DOI
  20. [28]Silver NC, Hittner JB, May K. A FORTRAN 77 Program for Comparing Dependent Correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 2006; 30: 152– 153. 10.1177/0146621605277132 · DOI
  21. [29]Hittner JB, May K. DEPCORR: A SAS Program for Comparing Dependent Correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 1998; 22: 93– 94. 10.1177/01466216980221010 · DOI
  22. [34]Weaver B, Wuensch KL. SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 45: 880– 895. 10.3758/s13428-012-0289-7 23344734 · DOI
  23. [35]Levy KJ. A Multiple Range Procedure for Independent Correlations. Educ Psychol Meas. 1976; 36: 27– 31. 10.1177/001316447603600103 · DOI
  24. [36]Paul SR. A Multiple Range Procedure for Independent Correlations. Can J Stat. 1989; 17: 217– 227. 10.2307/3314850 · DOI
  25. [37]Silver NC, Zaikina H, Hittner JB, May K. INCOR: A Computer Program for Testing Differences among Independent Correlations. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008; 8: 763– 764. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02107.x 21585885 · DOI
  26. [38]Cheung MWL, Chan W. Testing Dependent Correlations via Structural Equation Modeling. Org Res Methods. 2004; 7: 206– 223. 10.1177/1094428104264024 · DOI
  27. [39]Cheung MWL. Constructing Approximate Confidence Intervals for Parameters with Structural Equation Models. Struct Equ Modeling. 2009; 16: 267– 294. 10.1080/10705510902751291 · DOI
  28. [40]Rödiger S, Friedrichsmeier T, Kapat P, Michalke M. RKWard: A Comprehensive Graphical User Interface and Integrated Development Environment for Statistical Analysis with R. J Stat Softw. 2012; 49: 1– 34. Available: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v49/i09. Accessed 21 February 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Diedenhofen, Birk
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-04-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e0121945
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981244178
Cited by
1,919
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 181 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 248 · 2023: 236 · 2022: 240 · 2021: 253 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
77.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
statistical significance testing, R package, graphical user interface, statistical software
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Mathematical Computing, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review