Cited by 30Social and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationMedia Studies and Communication

Narratives Shape Cognitive Representations of Immigrants and Immigration-Policy Preferences

Open access
Martinez, Joel E., Feldman, Lauren A., Feldman, Mallory J., Cikara, Mina·2021·Psychological Science

Abstract

Scholars from across the social and media sciences have issued a clarion call to address a recent resurgence in criminalized characterizations of immigrants. Do these characterizations meaningfully impact individuals’ beliefs about immigrants and immigration? Across two online convenience samples (total N = 1,054 adult U.S. residents), we applied a novel analytic technique to test how different narratives—achievement, criminal, and struggle-oriented—impacted cognitive representations of German, Russian, Syrian, and Mexican immigrants and the concept of immigrants in general. All stories featured male targets. Achievement stories homogenized individual immigrant representations, whereas both criminal and struggle-oriented stories racialized them along a White/non-White axis: Germany clustered with Russia, and Syria clustered with Mexico. However, criminal stories were unique in making our most egalitarian participants’ representations as differentiated as our least egalitarian participants’. Narratives about individual immigrants also generalized to update representations of nationality groups. Most important, narrative-induced representations correlated with immigration-policy preferences: Achievement narratives and corresponding homogenized representations promoted preferences for less restriction, and criminal narratives promoted preferences for more.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797620963610

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narratives about marginalized groups, such as struggle-oriented stories about immigrants, can counteract system justification tendencies that might otherwise discount or disparage immigrants' experiences.

    “narratives about marginalized groups, such as struggle-oriented stories about immigrants, can counteract system justification tendencies that might otherwise discount or disparage immigrants’ experiences293–295.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Discussion and “Narratives influence support for immigration policy” sections report that struggle narratives were associated with preferences for fewer immigration restrictions, while higher system justification predicted support for the status quo or greater restrictions. But the policy results found no interaction between narrative type and system justification; the paper does not show that struggle stories counteract those tendencies or prevent people from discounting immigrants’ experiences. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar patterns of polarization to those in Germany have been observed in the USA.

    “Similar patterns have been observed in the USA294.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Current Research identifies U.S. residents as participants, and the Discussion reports differences in their representations of immigrants by narrative and ideology. The immigration-policy results also report differing preferences. The paper does not compare these U.S. findings with patterns of polarization in Germany, so the claimed similarity is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. In N. Foner & P. Simon (Eds.), Fear, anxiety, and national identity (pp. 115-142). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez, J. E., Feldman, L. A., Feldman, M. J., & Cikara, M.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Cikara, Mina
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2021-01-13
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
135-152
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W3118435036
Cited by
30
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CAREER 1653188)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
immigration narratives, immigration policy preferences, criminalization of immigrants, racialization, national stereotypes, German immigrants, Russian immigrants, Syrian immigrants, Mexican immigrants
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Emigration and Immigration, Ethnicity, Humans, Male, Public Policy, Emigrants and Immigrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review