CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismCancer Cells and MetastasisMechanisms of cancer metastasis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HIF-1α Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Metastasis through Direct Regulation of ZEB1 in Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Zhang, Wenjing, Shi, Xinpeng, Peng, Ying, Wu, Meiyan, Zhang, Pei, Xie, Ruyi, Wu, Yao, Yan, Qingqing, Liu, Side, Wang, Jide·2015·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0129603PMC PMC4461314
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

It is well recognized that hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) is involved in cancer metastasis, chemotherapy and poor prognosis. We previously found that deferoxamine, a hypoxia-mimetic agent, induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in colorectal cancer. Therefore, here we explored a new molecular mechanism for HIF-1α contributing to EMT and cancer metastasis through binding to ZEB1. In this study, we showed that overexpression of HIF-1α with adenovirus infection promoted EMT, cell invasion and migration in vitro and in vivo. On a molecular level, HIF-1α directly binding to the proximal promoter of ZEB1 via hypoxia response element (HRE) sites thus increasing the transactivity and expression of ZEB1. In addition, inhibition of ZEB1 was able to abrogate the HIF-1α-induced EMT and cell invasion. HIF-1α expression was highly correlated with the expression of ZEB1 in normal colorectal epithelium, primary and metastatic CRC tissues. Interestingly, both HIF-1α and ZEB1 were positively associated with Vimentin, an important mesenchymal marker of EMT, whereas negatively associated with E-cadherin expression. These findings suggest that HIF-1α enhances EMT and cancer metastasis by binding to ZEB1 promoter in CRC. HIF-1α and ZEB1 are both widely considered as tumor-initiating factors, but our results demonstrate that ZEB1 is a direct downstream of HIF-1α, suggesting a novel molecular mechanism for HIF-1α-inducing EMT and cancer metastasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0129603

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Overexpression of HIF-1α induced EMT and metastasis in CRC cell lines. (A) HT29 cells were transduced with Ad5-HIF-1α at the indicated MOI values for 48 hours. Fluorescence intensity and bright field at the same area were observed at the original magnification as 100X. (B) mRNA (left) and protein (right) expressions of HIF-1α were detected using RT-PCR and western blot, respectively. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (C) Cell morphology of wildtype HT29 or HT29 cells transduced with the indicated adenoviruses (Original magnification = 400X). (D) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α, E-cadherin, Plakoglobin, Vimentin and N-cadherin in adenovirus-infected HT29 and HCT116 cells. GAPDH was used as the internal control. (E) Fold change of invasion and migration in the indicated cells. Quantification of the results was shown in the bar graph with means ± SD. *P < 0.05. (F) Wound healing assay. Cell monolayers were scratched with a pipette tip and images were taken 0, 24 and 48 hours after wound formation. *P < 0.05.
Fig 1 Overexpression of HIF-1α induced EMT and metastasis in CRC cell lines. (A) HT29 cells were transduced with Ad5-HIF-1α at the indicated MOI values for 48 hours. Fluorescence intensity and bright field at the same area were observed at the original magnification as 100X. (B) mRNA (left) and protein (right) expressions of HIF-1α were detected using RT-PCR and western blot, respectively. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (C) Cell morphology of wildtype HT29 or HT29 cells transduced with the indicated adenoviruses (Original magnification = 400X). (D) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α, E-cadherin, Plakoglobin, Vimentin and N-cadherin in adenovirus-infected HT29 and HCT116 cells. GAPDH was used as the internal control. (E) Fold change of invasion and migration in the indicated cells. Quantification of the results was shown in the bar graph with means ± SD. *P < 0.05. (F) Wound healing assay. Cell monolayers were scratched with a pipette tip and images were taken 0, 24 and 48 hours after wound formation. *P < 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 HIF-1α overexpression promoted liver metastasis in vivo. Representative photographic pictures (A) and H&E staining (B) of liver of BALB/c mice five weeks after subsplenic injection of HT29 cells transduced with Ad5-HIF-1α or control viruses. White arrows indicated metastatic nodules. (C) The comparison of liver metastases between HT29-Ad5-HIF-1α mice (N = 12) and control mice (N = 8). *P < 0.05. (D) Confirmation of the overexpression of HIF-1α from metastatic nodules in mice injected with Ad5-HIF-1α by qPCR, compared with those injected with control viruses.
Fig 2 HIF-1α overexpression promoted liver metastasis in vivo. Representative photographic pictures (A) and H&E staining (B) of liver of BALB/c mice five weeks after subsplenic injection of HT29 cells transduced with Ad5-HIF-1α or control viruses. White arrows indicated metastatic nodules. (C) The comparison of liver metastases between HT29-Ad5-HIF-1α mice (N = 12) and control mice (N = 8). *P < 0.05. (D) Confirmation of the overexpression of HIF-1α from metastatic nodules in mice injected with Ad5-HIF-1α by qPCR, compared with those injected with control viruses.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Regulation of HIF-1α on ZEB1 and their expressions in CRC. (A) Endogenous expression levels of HIF-1α and ZEB1 in the indicated five cell lines were detected by qPCR with GAPDH used as the internal control. (B&C) HT29 cells were transduced with Ad5-HIF-1α or control viruses for 48 hours, following by qPCR and western blot to detect the expression of HIF-1α and ZEB1. GAPDH was used as the internal control. (D) HIF-1α and ZEB1 protein levels in matched nonneoplastic/cancerous colorectal tissues. N: normal; T: tumor. The level of each protein was normalized against GAPDH. (E) Representative pictures of IHC staining on human CRC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples for HIF-1α and ZEB1. Left panel showed the adjacent normal colorectal tissues. Right panel showed CRC specimens. Original magnification, 200X.
Fig 3 Regulation of HIF-1α on ZEB1 and their expressions in CRC. (A) Endogenous expression levels of HIF-1α and ZEB1 in the indicated five cell lines were detected by qPCR with GAPDH used as the internal control. (B&C) HT29 cells were transduced with Ad5-HIF-1α or control viruses for 48 hours, following by qPCR and western blot to detect the expression of HIF-1α and ZEB1. GAPDH was used as the internal control. (D) HIF-1α and ZEB1 protein levels in matched nonneoplastic/cancerous colorectal tissues. N: normal; T: tumor. The level of each protein was normalized against GAPDH. (E) Representative pictures of IHC staining on human CRC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples for HIF-1α and ZEB1. Left panel showed the adjacent normal colorectal tissues. Right panel showed CRC specimens. Original magnification, 200X.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Regulation of ZEB1 by HIF-1α through HRE-3. (A) Schematic representation of the proximal promoter (~ 3500 nt upstream) of ZEB1 gene. HRE: hypoxia response element. (B) Oligonucleotides for EMSA were wildtype (lane 1–3) and mutant (lane 4–5) probe 3 from the ZEB1 promoter, which contained a consensus HRE-3. Nuclear extracts prepared from HT29-Ad5-HIF-1α (lane 3 and 5) or control cells (lane 2 and 4) were incubated with [γ-32P] ATP-labelled probe before electrophoresis. Negative control was performed with wildtype probe without nuclear extract (lane 1). (C) Schematic representation of the promoter region of ZEB1 and the report constructs used in adenovirus-infected experiments. The constructs contained wildtype (pluc567-wt) or mutant (pluc567-mut) HRE-3 located -634 ~ -630 nt upstream of the transcription start site of ZEB1. (D) Activation of plu567 or pluc567-mut in Ad5-HIF-1α- or Ad5-EGFP-infected HT29 cells (N = 3 replicate experiments). *, # P < 0.05.
Fig 4 Regulation of ZEB1 by HIF-1α through HRE-3. (A) Schematic representation of the proximal promoter (~ 3500 nt upstream) of ZEB1 gene. HRE: hypoxia response element. (B) Oligonucleotides for EMSA were wildtype (lane 1–3) and mutant (lane 4–5) probe 3 from the ZEB1 promoter, which contained a consensus HRE-3. Nuclear extracts prepared from HT29-Ad5-HIF-1α (lane 3 and 5) or control cells (lane 2 and 4) were incubated with [γ-32P] ATP-labelled probe before electrophoresis. Negative control was performed with wildtype probe without nuclear extract (lane 1). (C) Schematic representation of the promoter region of ZEB1 and the report constructs used in adenovirus-infected experiments. The constructs contained wildtype (pluc567-wt) or mutant (pluc567-mut) HRE-3 located -634 ~ -630 nt upstream of the transcription start site of ZEB1. (D) Activation of plu567 or pluc567-mut in Ad5-HIF-1α- or Ad5-EGFP-infected HT29 cells (N = 3 replicate experiments). *, # P < 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 5 ZEB1 inhibition abolished HIF-1α-induced EMT and metastasis. (A) Western blot analysis of ZEB1, E-cadherin and Vimentin in HCT116-Ad5-HIF-1α or HCT116-HIF-1α-shZEB1 cells. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Invasion (B) and migration (C) assays were performed in the same two cell lines. The representative images of invaded cells in the inserts of transwell chambers were shown at original magnification = 200X. *P < 0.05. (D) Representative photographic pictures and H&E staining of liver of BALB/c mice 5 weeks after subsplenic injection of HCT116-Ad5-HIF-1α or HCT116-HIF-1α-shZEB1 cells. (E) Quantification of the average numbers of metastatic foci in the livers of mice (N = 5). *P < 0.05.
Fig 5 ZEB1 inhibition abolished HIF-1α-induced EMT and metastasis. (A) Western blot analysis of ZEB1, E-cadherin and Vimentin in HCT116-Ad5-HIF-1α or HCT116-HIF-1α-shZEB1 cells. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Invasion (B) and migration (C) assays were performed in the same two cell lines. The representative images of invaded cells in the inserts of transwell chambers were shown at original magnification = 200X. *P < 0.05. (D) Representative photographic pictures and H&E staining of liver of BALB/c mice 5 weeks after subsplenic injection of HCT116-Ad5-HIF-1α or HCT116-HIF-1α-shZEB1 cells. (E) Quantification of the average numbers of metastatic foci in the livers of mice (N = 5). *P < 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 6 Expression statuses of HIF-1α, ZEB1, Vimentin and E-cadherin in tissue specimens. Representative images of IHC (A) and quantification of positive tumor cells (B) in both primary CRC specimens and the according metastatic lymph node. Original magnification, 200X. *P < 0.05 and # P > 0.05.
Fig 6 Expression statuses of HIF-1α, ZEB1, Vimentin and E-cadherin in tissue specimens. Representative images of IHC (A) and quantification of positive tumor cells (B) in both primary CRC specimens and the according metastatic lymph node. Original magnification, 200X. *P < 0.05 and # P > 0.05.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., Shi, X., Peng, Y., Wu, M., Zhang, P., Xie, R., Wu, Y., Yan, Q., Liu, S., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Side
  • Wang, Jide
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2015-06-09
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e0129603
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0129603
PMC
PMC4461314
OpenAlex
W621464006
Cited by
261
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Southern Medical University
  • Nanfang Hospital (G201227)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mechanisms of cancer metastasis
Keywords
HIF-1α, ZEB1, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, colorectal cancer, metastasis, hypoxia response element, transcriptional regulation, cell invasion, cell migration, vimentin, E-cadherin, deferoxamine, tumor suppressor
MeSH terms
Zinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1, Animals, Base Sequence, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Mice, Nude, Molecular Sequence Data, Transcription Factors, Vimentin, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cadherins, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Homeodomain Proteins, HT29 Cells, Response Elements, HCT116 Cells, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review