CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collagen Fingerprinting: A New Screening Technique for Radiocarbon Dating Ancient Bone

Harvey, Virginia L., Egerton, Victoria M., Chamberlain, Andrew T., Manning, Phillip L., Buckley, Michael·2016·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0150650PMC PMC4777535
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0150650

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ZooMS analysis enables screening for hominin remains ahead of further downstream biomolecular analysis such as radiocarbon dating or aDNA analysis.

    “ZooMS analysis enables screening for hominin remains ahead of further downstream biomolecular analysis such as radiocarbon dating (142) or aDNA analysis (143).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [142]

    The Introduction (‘Radiocarbon dating on the Cayman Islands’) and Results (‘ZooMS as a screening technique’) support using ZooMS to identify bone samples for radiocarbon dating. The study tested sub-fossil mammal remains from Cayman Brac, not hominin remains, so the hominin-specific application is an extrapolation. The separate aDNA citation is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. KM Holmes, 2005, Assessing the distribution of African Palaeolithic sites: a predictive model of collagen degradation, Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 157, 10.1016/j.jas.2004.06.002 · DOI
  2. F Brock, 2007, Radiocarbon dating bone samples recovered from gravel sites, EH Res Dept Rep Ser, 30, 2007
  3. GJ Van Klinken, 1999, Bone collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements, Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 687, 10.1006/jasc.1998.0385 · DOI
  4. MJ Aitken, 2014, Science-based dating in archaeology, 10.4324/9781315836645 · DOI
  5. C Bronk Ramsey, 2008, Radiocarbon dating: Revolutions in Understanding, Archaeometry, 50, 249, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00394.x · DOI
  6. RM Hedges, 1992, A review of current approaches in the pretreatment of bone for radiocarbon dating by AMS, Radiocarbon, 34, 279, 10.1017/S0033822200063438 · DOI
  7. T-C Chiu, 2007, Analysis of the atmospheric 14 C record spanning the past 50,000 years derived from high-precision 230 Th/234 U/238 U, 231 Pa/235 U and 14 C dates on fossil corals, Quaternary Science Reviews, 26, 18, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.06.015 · DOI
  8. MME Jans, 2002, In situ preservation of archaeological bone: a histological study within a multidisciplinary approach, Archaeometry, 44, 343, 10.1111/1475-4754.t01-1-00067 · DOI
  9. G Turner-Walker, 2002, Sub-micron spongiform porosity is the major ultra-structural alteration occurring in archaeological bone, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 12, 407, 10.1002/oa.642 · DOI
  10. N Hoke, 2011, Estimating the chance of success of archaeometric analyses of bone: UV-induced bone fluorescence compared to histological screening, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 310, 23, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.03.021 · DOI
  11. F Brock, 2012, Reliability of nitrogen content (% N) and carbon: nitrogen atomic ratios (C: N) as indicators of collagen preservation suitable for radiocarbon dating, Radiocarbon, 54, 879, 10.1017/S0033822200047524 · DOI
  12. F Brock, 2013, Analysis of Bone "Collagen" Extraction Products for Radiocarbon Dating, Radiocarbon, 55, 445, 10.1017/S0033822200057581 · DOI
  13. A Marom, 2012, Single amino acid radiocarbon dating of Upper Paleolithic modern humans, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 6878, 10.1073/pnas.1116328109 · DOI
  14. M Buckley, 2009, Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 23, 3843, 10.1002/rcm.4316 · DOI · Paper page
  15. M Buckley, 2010, Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide, Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 13, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  16. M Buckley, 2011, Collagen fingerprinting of archaeological bone and teeth remains from Domuztepe, South Eastern Turkey, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 3, 271, 10.1007/s12520-011-0066-z · DOI
  17. LG van der Sluis, 2014, Combining histology, stable isotope analysis and ZooMS collagen fingerprinting to investigate the taphonomic history and dietary behaviour of extinct giant tortoises from the Mare aux Songes deposit on Mauritius, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 416, 80, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.06.003 · DOI
  18. M Buckley, 2016, High-throughput collagen fingerprinting of intact microfaunal remains; a low-cost method for distinguishing between murine rodent bones, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 30, 1, 10.1002/rcm.7483 · DOI
  19. M Buckley, 2011, Collagen survival and its use for species identification in Holocene-lower Pleistocene bone fragments from British archaeological and paleontological sites, Antiqua, 1, 1, 10.4081/antiqua.2011.e1 · DOI
  20. M Buckley, 2014, Species identification of archaeological marine mammals using collagen fingerprinting, Journal of Archaeological Science, 41, 631, 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.021 · DOI
  21. M Buckley, 2008, Comparing the survival of osteocalcin and mtDNA in archaeological bone from four European sites, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 1756, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.11.022 · DOI
  22. SE Halcrow, 2014, Assessing Raman Spectroscopy as a Prescreening Tool for the Selection of Archaeological Bone for Stable Isotopic Analysis, PloS one, 9, e98462, 10.1371/journal.pone.0098462 · DOI
  23. DW Steadman, 1985, A new species of bullfinch (Aves: Emberizinae) from a Late Quaternary cave deposit on Cayman Brac, West Indies, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 98, 544
  24. GA Goodfriend, 1983, Limestone and the problem of radiocarbon dating of land-snail shell carbonate, Geology, 11, 575, 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<575:LATPOR>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. CB Ramsey, 2002, Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 31, Archaeometry, 44, 1, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2002.tb01101.x · DOI
  26. CB Ramsey, 2004, Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford, Radiocarbon, 46, 155, 10.1017/S0033822200039473 · DOI
  27. CB Ramsey, 2004, Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations, Radiocarbon, 46, 17, 10.1017/S0033822200039308 · DOI
  28. CB Ramsey, 2013, Calibration for archaeological and environmental terrestrial samples in the time range 26–50 ka cal BP, Radiocarbon, 55, 2021, 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16935 · DOI · Paper page
  29. REM Hedges, 2002, Bone diagenesis: an overview of processes, Archaeometry, 44, 319, 10.1111/1475-4754.00064 · DOI · Paper page
  30. WJ Pestle, 2012, Bone collagen preservation in the tropics: a case study from ancient Puerto Rico, Journal of Archaeological Science, 39, 2079, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.03.008 · DOI
  31. DW Steadman, 2005, Asynchronous extinction of late Quaternary sloths on continents and islands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 11763, 10.1073/pnas.0502777102 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harvey, V. L., Egerton, V. M., Chamberlain, A. T., Manning, P. L., & Buckley, M.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2016-03-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
e0150650
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0150650
PMC
PMC4777535
Cited by
65
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review