Cited by 129Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchTree-ring climate responses

Calibration for Archaeological and Environmental Terrestrial Samples in the Time Range 26–50 ka cal BP

Open access
Ramsey, C Bronk, Scott, E M, van der Plicht, J·2013·Radiocarbon

Abstract

For the older part of the radiocarbon dating range, the IntCal13 curve provides the “state of the art” for terrestrial calibration based on all available data. It is constructed from different records, each of which by themselves could be used as a “comparison tool,” depending on the research objectives. This paper discusses the pros and cons of different approaches that can be taken when using 14 C dates from this time range where the agreement amongst the underlying data sets is poorer than in other time periods. The discussion is illustrated with example calibrations against IntCa09, IntCal13, and comparisons to the Suigetsu record. The examples and discussion arc aimed at users of terrestrial 14 C dates, in particular Upper Paleolithic archaeologists and those working with environmental terrestrial materials in the same time range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16935

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bard E, Rostek F, Ménot-Combes G. 2004. A better ra- diocarbon clock. Science 303(5655):178-9.
  2. kyr B.P. Science 338(6105): 370-4.
  3. Edwards RL, Cheng H, Wang YJ, Yuan DX, Kelly MJ, Kong XG, Wang XF, Burnett A, Smith E. 2013. A re- fined Hulu and Dongge Cave climate record and the timing of the climate change during the last glacial cy- cle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, submitted.
  4. Muscheler R, Beer J, Kubik PW, Synal H-A. 2005. Geo- magnetic field intensity during the last 60,000 years based on 10 Be and 36 Cl from the Summit ice cores and 14 C. Quaternary Science Reviews 24(16-17):1849- 60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramsey, C. B., Scott, E. M., & van der Plicht, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, C Bronk
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2013
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
2021-2027
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2021944208
Cited by
129
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 4
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NRCF010002, NE/H007865/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
Keywords
radiocarbon calibration, terrestrial samples, Upper Palaeolithic, Late Glacial, Holocene, calibration curve, archaeological chronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review