Cited by 33Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMicrobial infections and disease research

Vaccination of sheep with a methanogen protein provides insight into levels of antibody in saliva needed to target ruminal methanogens

Open access
Subharat, Supatsak, Shu, Dairu, Zheng, Tao, Buddle, Bryce M., Kaneko, Kan, Hook, Sarah, Janssen, Peter H., Wedlock, D. Neil·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Methane is produced in the rumen of ruminant livestock by methanogens and is a major contributor to agricultural greenhouse gases. Vaccination against ruminal methanogens could reduce methane emissions by inducing antibodies in saliva which enter the rumen and impair ability of methanogens to produce methane. Presently, it is not known if vaccination can induce sufficient amounts of antibody in the saliva to target methanogen populations in the rumen and little is known about how long antibody in the rumen remains active. In the current study, sheep were vaccinated twice at a 3-week interval with a model methanogen antigen, recombinant glycosyl transferase protein (rGT2) formulated with one of four adjuvants: saponin, Montanide ISA61, a chitosan thermogel, or a lipid nanoparticle/cationic liposome adjuvant (n = 6/formulation). A control group of sheep (n = 6) was not vaccinated. The highest antigen-specific IgA and IgG responses in both saliva and serum were observed with Montanide ISA61, which promoted levels of salivary antibodies that were five-fold higher than the second most potent adjuvant, saponin. A rGT2-specific IgG standard was used to determine the level of rGT2-specific IgG in serum and saliva. Vaccination with GT2/Montanide ISA61 produced a peak antibody concentration of 7 × 1016 molecules of antigen-specific IgG per litre of saliva, and it was estimated that in the rumen there would be more than 104 molecules of antigen-specific IgG for each methanogen cell. Both IgG and IgA in saliva were shown to be relatively stable in the rumen. Salivary antibody exposed for 1-2 hours to an in vitro simulated rumen environment retained approximately 50% of antigen-binding activity. Collectively, the results from measuring antibody levels and stablility suggest a vaccination-based mitigation strategy for livestock generated methane is in theory feasible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0159861

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vaccination can induce the host immune system to create antibodies capable of suppressing methanogens, potentially reducing CH4 emissions, particularly in pasture-based systems.

    “Vaccination, by inducing the host immune system to create antibodies capable of suppressing methanogens, has the potential to reduce CH4 emissions and is particularly beneficial for pasture-based systems.130”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [130]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subharat, S., Shu, D., Zheng, T., Buddle, B. M., Kaneko, K., Hook, S., Janssen, P. H., & Wedlock, D. N.
Affiliations
  • AgResearch (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Subharat, Supatsak
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-07-29
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e0159861
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2487117742
Cited by
32
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
sheep, salivary antibodies, IgA, IgG, adjuvants, saponins, rumen environment, antibody stability, greenhouse gas emissions
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Antigens, Archaea, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Immunoglobulin A, Immunoglobulin G, Rumen, Saliva, Vaccination, Archaeal Proteins, Sheep, Domestic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review