Cited by 154Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Clinical Phenotypes and Comorbidity in European Sleep Apnoea Patients

Open access
Saaresranta, Tarja, Hedner, Jan, Bonsignore, Maria R., Riha, Renata L., McNicholas, Walter T., Penzel, Thomas, Anttalainen, Ulla, Kvamme, John Arthur +5 more·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical presentation phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and their association with comorbidity as well as impact on adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment have not been established. METHODS: A prospective follow-up cohort of adult patients with OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) of ≥5/h) from 17 European countries and Israel (n = 6,555) was divided into four clinical presentation phenotypes based on daytime symptoms labelled as excessive daytime sleepiness ("EDS") and nocturnal sleep problems other than OSA (labelled as "insomnia"): 1) EDS (daytime+/nighttime-), 2) EDS/insomnia (daytime+/nighttime+), 3) non-EDS/non-insomnia (daytime-/nighttime-), 4) and insomnia (daytime-/nighttime+) phenotype. RESULTS: The EDS phenotype comprised 20.7%, the non-EDS/non-insomnia type 25.8%, the EDS/insomnia type 23.7%, and the insomnia phenotype 29.8% of the entire cohort. Thus, clinical presentation phenotypes with insomnia symptoms were dominant with 53.5%, but only 5.6% had physician diagnosed insomnia. Cardiovascular comorbidity was less prevalent in the EDS and most common in the insomnia phenotype (48.9% vs. 56.8%, p<0.001) despite more severe OSA in the EDS group (AHI 35.0±25.5/h vs. 27.9±22.5/h, p<0.001, respectively). Psychiatric comorbidity was associated with insomnia like OSA phenotypes independent of age, gender and body mass index (HR 1.5 (1.188-1.905), p<0.001). The EDS phenotype tended to associate with higher CPAP usage (22.7 min/d, p = 0.069) when controlled for age, gender, BMI and sleep apnoea severity. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypes with insomnia symptoms comprised more than half of OSA patients and were more frequently linked with comorbidity than those with EDS, despite less severe OSA. CPAP usage was slightly higher in phenotypes with EDS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0163439

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saaresranta, T., Hedner, J., Bonsignore, M. R., Riha, R. L., McNicholas, W. T., Penzel, T., Anttalainen, U., Kvamme, J. A., Pretl, M., Sliwinski, P., Verbraecken, J., Grote, L., & ESADA Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Istituto di Biomedicina e di Immunologia Molecolare Alberto Monroy (IT)
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno (CZ)
  • Helse Førde (NO)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Saaresranta, Tarja
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-10-04
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
e0163439
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2529555766
Cited by
154
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Respiratory Society
  • Sleep Research Society
  • ResMed
  • Ege Üniversitesi
  • Università degli Studi di Palermo
  • Turun Yliopisto
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset
  • Universiteit Antwerpen
  • Filha
  • Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, clinical phenotype, comorbidities, excessive daytime sleepiness, insomnia, cardiovascular comorbidity, psychiatric comorbidity, CPAP adherence, apnea-hypopnea index, European patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Comorbidity, Prevalence, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review