Cited by 74Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

A randomized controlled trial of CBT-I and PAP for obstructive sleep apnea and comorbid insomnia: main outcomes from the MATRICS study

Open access
Ong, Jason C, Crawford, Megan R, Dawson, Spencer C, Fogg, Louis F, Turner, Arlener D, Wyatt, James K, Crisostomo, Maria I, Chhangani, Bantu S +6 more·2020·Sleep

Abstract

Study Objectives: To investigate treatment models using cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and positive airway pressure (PAP) for people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and comorbid insomnia. Methods: 121 adults with OSA and comorbid insomnia were randomized to receive CBT-I followed by PAP, CBT-I concurrent with PAP, or PAP only. PAP was delivered following standard clinical procedures for in-lab titration and home setup and CBT-I was delivered in four individual sessions. The primary outcome measure was PAP adherence across the first 90 days, with regular PAP use (≥4 h on ≥70% of nights during a 30-day period) serving as the clinical endpoint. The secondary outcome measures were the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) with good sleeper (PSQI <5), remission (ISI <8), and response (ISI reduction from baseline >7) serving as the clinical endpoints. Results: No significant differences were found between the concomitant treatment arms and PAP only on PAP adherence measures, including the percentage of participants who met the clinical endpoint. Compared to PAP alone, the concomitant treatment arms reported a significantly greater reduction from baseline on the ISI (p = .0009) and had a greater percentage of participants who were good sleepers (p = .044) and remitters (p = .008). No significant differences were found between the sequential and concurrent treatment models on any outcome measure. Conclusions: The findings from this study indicate that combining CBT-I with PAP is superior to PAP alone on insomnia outcomes but does not significantly improve adherence to PAP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/zsaa041

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]2. Balk E, Moorthy D, Obadan N, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults. Comparative Effectiveness Review no. 32. In . Vol 32: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. Accepted Manuscript
  2. [32]32. Edinger JD, Wyatt JK, Olsen MK, et al. Reliability and validity of the Duke Structured Interview for sleep disorders for insomnia screening. . Sleep. 2009;32:A265-A265.
  3. [47]47. Bastien CH, Vallières A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep medicine. 2001;2(4):297-307.
  4. [52]52. Wickwire EM, Smith MT, Birnbaum S, Collop NA. Sleep maintenance insomnia complaints predict poor CPAP adherence: A clinical case series. Sleep Med. 2010;11(8):772-776.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ong, J. C., Crawford, M. R., Dawson, S. C., Fogg, L. F., Turner, A. D., Wyatt, J. K., Crisostomo, M. I., Chhangani, B. S., Kushida, C. A., Edinger, J. D., Abbott, S. M., Malkani, R. G., Attarian, H. P., & Zee, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • National Jewish Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ong, Jason C
Venue
Sleep
Published
2020-03-14
Volume
43
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W3011555365
Cited by
74
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL114529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, positive airway pressure, obstructive sleep apnea, comorbid insomnia, PAP adherence, insomnia severity, sleep quality, treatment remission
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review