Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identification of Anion Channels Responsible for Fluoride Resistance in Oral Streptococci

Men, Xiaochen, Shibata, Yukie, Takeshita, Toru, Yamashita, Yoshihisa·2016·PLOS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0165900

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Locations of eriC and crcB genes in 18 oral streptococci. These species were selected based on the following criteria: identification in ≥ 10% of 166 orally healthy subjects and ≥ 0.01% of the mean relative abundance [10].
Fig 1 Locations of eriC and crcB genes in 18 oral streptococci. These species were selected based on the following criteria: identification in ≥ 10% of 166 orally healthy subjects and ≥ 0.01% of the mean relative abundance [10].CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Growth yields of 13 oral streptococci at various NaF concentrations. The y-axis represents the OD550 after incubation for 16 h. The data represent the mean standard deviations of three independent experiments.
Fig 2 Growth yields of 13 oral streptococci at various NaF concentrations. The y-axis represents the OD550 after incubation for 16 h. The data represent the mean standard deviations of three independent experiments.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Growth yields of the parent strains, eriC or crcB deletion mutants, and complemented strains in S. mutans (A), S. anginosus (B), and S. sanguinis (C) at various NaF concentrations. The y-axis represents the OD550 after incubation for 16 h. Data represent the mean standard deviations of three independent experiments. *, significant differences against the OD550 value of the wild-type strain within the same NaF concentration.
Fig 3 Growth yields of the parent strains, eriC or crcB deletion mutants, and complemented strains in S. mutans (A), S. anginosus (B), and S. sanguinis (C) at various NaF concentrations. The y-axis represents the OD550 after incubation for 16 h. Data represent the mean standard deviations of three independent experiments. *, significant differences against the OD550 value of the wild-type strain within the same NaF concentration.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Growth yields of the parent strains and the complemented strains. (A) Complementation by S. mutans EriC1b, S. anginosus EriC1, or S. sanguinis CrcB1/CrcB2 in the S. mutans EriC1a/EriC1b double mutant. (B) Complementation by S. anginosus EriC1 or S. mutans EriC1b in the S. anginosus EriC1 mutant. (C) Complementation by S. sanguinis CrcB1/CrcB2 or S. mutans EriC1b in the S. sanguinis CrcB1/CrcB2 double mutant. The y-axis represents the OD550 after incubation for 16 h. The data represent the mean standard deviations of three independent experiments. *, significant differences against the OD550 value of the wild-type strain within the same NaF concentration; #, significant differences against the OD550 value of the strain complemented by its own fluoride-resistance gene(s) within the same NaF concentration.
Fig 4 Growth yields of the parent strains and the complemented strains. (A) Complementation by S. mutans EriC1b, S. anginosus EriC1, or S. sanguinis CrcB1/CrcB2 in the S. mutans EriC1a/EriC1b double mutant. (B) Complementation by S. anginosus EriC1 or S. mutans EriC1b in the S. anginosus EriC1 mutant. (C) Complementation by S. sanguinis CrcB1/CrcB2 or S. mutans EriC1b in the S. sanguinis CrcB1/CrcB2 double mutant. The y-axis represents the OD550 after incubation for 16 h. The data represent the mean standard deviations of three independent experiments. *, significant differences against the OD550 value of the wild-type strain within the same NaF concentration; #, significant differences against the OD550 value of the strain complemented by its own fluoride-resistance gene(s) within the same NaF concentration.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. RE Marquis, 2003, Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology, FEMS Microbiol Rev, 26, 493, 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2003.tb00627.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. RR Mayhew, 1981, Comparative effect of SnF2, NaF, and SnCl2 on the growth of Streptococcus mutans, J Dent Res, 60, 1809, 10.1177/00220345810600101301 · DOI
  3. M Maltz, 1982, Susceptibility of oral bacteria to various fluoride salts, J Dent Res, 61, 786, 10.1177/00220345820610062701 · DOI
  4. JL Streckfuss, 1980, Fluoride resistance and adherence of selected strains of Streptococcus mutans to smooth surfaces after exposure to fluoride, J Dent Res, 59, 151, 10.1177/00220345800590021501 · DOI
  5. FR Bunick, 1981, Enolases from fluoride-sensitive and fluoride-resistant streptococci, Infect Immun, 34, 856, 10.1128/IAI.34.3.856-863.1981 · DOI
  6. LR Brown, 1983, Effect of continuous fluoride gel use on plaque fluoride retention and microbial activity, J Dent Res, 62, 746, 10.1177/00220345830620061201 · DOI
  7. C Van Loveren, 1991, In vitro demineralization of enamel by F-sensitive and F-resistant mutans streptococci in the presence of 0, 0.05, or 0.5 mmol/L NaF, J Dent Res, 70, 1491, 10.1177/00220345910700120401 · DOI
  8. C Van Loveren, 1991, Acidogenesis in relation to fluoride resistance of Streptococcus mutans, Oral Microbiol Immunol, 6, 288, 10.1111/j.1399-302X.1991.tb00494.x · DOI
  9. GL Hoelscher, 1996, Characterization of an unusual fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans isolate, Curr microbiol, 32, 156, 10.1007/s002849900028 · DOI
  10. K Moritani, 2015, Acetaldehyde production by major oral microbes, Oral Dis, 21, 748, 10.1111/odi.12341 · DOI
  11. T Takeshita, 2015, Dental plaque development on a hydroxyapatite disk in young adults observed by using a barcoded pyrosequencing approach, Sci Rep, 5, 8136, 10.1038/srep08136 · DOI · Paper page
  12. AH Rickard, 2003, Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms, Trends Microbiol, 11, 94, 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)00034-3 · DOI · Paper page
  13. S Silver, 1996, Bacterial resistances to toxic metal ions–a review, Gene, 179, 9, 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00323-X · DOI
  14. JL Baker, 2012, Widespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride, Science, 35, 233, 10.1126/science.1215063 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Y Liao, 2015, Identification and functional analysis of genome mutations in a fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans strain, PloS One, 10, e0122630, 10.1371/journal.pone.0122630 · DOI · Paper page
  16. D Hanahan, 1983, Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids, J Mol Biol, 166, 557, 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8 · DOI
  17. D Perry, 1983, Genetic transformation of putative cariogenic properties in Streptococcus mutans, Infect Immun, 41, 722, 10.1128/IAI.41.2.722-727.1983 · DOI
  18. D Li, 2012, A novel gene involved in the survival of Streptococcus mutans under stress conditions, Appl Environ Microbiol, 80, 97, 10.1128/AEM.02549-13 · DOI
  19. M Kawada-Matsuo, 2009, Role of two component signaling response regulators in acid tolerance of Streptococcus mutans, Oral Microbiol Immunol, 24, 173, 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00485.x · DOI
  20. RB Stockbridge, 2012, Fluoride resistance and transport by riboswitch-controlled CLC antiporters, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109, 15289, 10.1073/pnas.1210896109 · DOI · Paper page
  21. TJ Jentsch, 2002, Molecular structure and physiological function of chloride channels, Physiol rev, 82, 503, 10.1152/physrev.00029.2001 · DOI
  22. M Maduke, 1999, High-level expression, functional reconstitution, and quaternary structure of a prokaryotic ClC-type chloride channel, J Gen Physiol, 114, 713, 10.1085/jgp.114.5.713 · DOI
  23. S Li, 2013, Eukaryotic resistance to fluoride toxicity mediated by a widespread family of fluoride export proteins, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110, 19018, 10.1073/pnas.1310439110 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Y Kawamura, 1995, Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus, Int J Sys Bacteriol, 45, 406, 10.1099/00207713-45-2-406 · DOI
  25. R Dutzler, 2002, MacKinnon, R. X-ray structure of a ClC chloride channel at 3.0 Å reveals the molecular basis of anion selectivity, Nature, 415, 287, 10.1038/415287a · DOI · Paper page
  26. T Murata, 2016, Contribution of chloride channel permease to fluorideresistance in Streptococcus mutans, FEMS Microbiol, 363, fnw101, 10.1093/femsle/fnw101 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Men, X., Shibata, Y., Takeshita, T., & Yamashita, Y.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-11-08
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
e0165900
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
37
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (25463251, 25293428)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review