Cited by 102Health disparities and outcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsChronic Disease Management Strategies

Allostatic load as a predictor of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population: evidence from the Scottish Health Survey

Open access
Robertson, Tony, Beveridge, Gayle, Bromley, Catherine·2017·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Allostatic load is a multiple biomarker measure of physiological 'wear and tear' that has shown some promise as marker of overall physiological health, but its power as a risk predictor for mortality and morbidity is less well known. This study has used data from the 2003 Scottish Health Survey (SHeS) (nationally representative sample of Scottish population) linked to mortality records to assess how well allostatic load predicts all-cause and cause-specific mortality. From the sample, data from 4,488 men and women were available with mortality status at 5 and 9.5 (rounded to 10) years after sampling in 2003. Cox proportional hazard models estimated the risk of death (all-cause and the five major causes of death in the population) according to allostatic load score. Multiple imputation was used to address missing values in the dataset. Analyses were also adjusted for potential confounders (sex, age and deprivation). There were 258 and 618 deaths over the 5-year and 10-year follow-up period, respectively. In the fully-adjusted model, higher allostatic load (poorer physiological 'health') was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality after 5 years (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.22; p = 0.269), but it was after 10 years (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16; p = 0.026). Allostatic load was not associated with specific causes of death over the same follow-up period. In conclusions, greater physiological wear and tear across multiple physiological systems, as measured by allostatic load, is associated with an increased risk of death, but may not be as useful as a predictor for specific causes of death.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0183297

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are reliable indices of early damage to regulatory systems, allostatic load, and cellular aging such as inflammation, telomere length, and epigenetic clock that can be measured during mid-life and serve as markers, risk factors, and likely mechanistic precursors to disease or early mortality.

    “Fortunately, although diagnosable disease does not occur until later in life, there are several reliable indices of early damage to regulatory systems, allostatic load (Hwang et al., 2014; Robertson et al., 2017; Seeman et al., 2001), and cellular aging such as inflammation, telomere length, and epigenetic clock (Chen et al., 2016; Codd et al., 2013; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration et al., 201”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Robertson et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robertson, T., Beveridge, G., & Bromley, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy (GB)
  • UK Statistics Authority (GB)
Corresponding author
Robertson, Tony
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2017-08-16
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
e0183297
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2747845624
Cited by
102
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/K023209/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
allostatic load, mortality prediction, all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, biomarkers, physiological health, Scottish Health Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cause of Death, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Scotland, Proportional Hazards Models, Allostasis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review