Cited by 32Hepatitis C virus researchCOVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Impact of treatment with direct-acting antivirals on anxiety and depression in chronic hepatitis C

Open access
Gallach, Marta, Vergara, Mercedes, da Costa, Joao Pedro, Miquel, Mireia, Casas, Meritxell, Sanchez-Delgado, Jordi, Dalmau, Blai, Rudi, Núria +6 more·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Treatment of hepatitis C with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) has few side effects. Although pivotal studies suggested that DAA were safe in patients with psychiatric diseases who could not be treated with previous antiviral therapies, their effects on anxiety and depression have not yet been analysed in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to analyse anxiety and depression in the setting of DAA treatment in a clinical practice series. METHODS: All patients starting DAA treatment between November 1, 2014 and October 31, 2015 were eligible. Patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale at different times during treatment. The results were plotted on line graphs and evaluated using a linear regression model with repeated measures. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-five patients were included (11% with major psychiatric disorders; 32% on psychiatric treatment). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 97.3% of cases. Anxiety and depression measures did not differ between time points. No differences between patients on psychiatric treatment or with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis were found at any time point analysed. CONCLUSION: DAA treatment had no impact on anxiety or depression during or after chronic hepatitis C infection treatment, even in high-risk patients with major psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0208112

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gallach and colleagues showed the prevalence of self-reported baseline depression was 13.1%.

    “Gallach and colleagues showed that the prevalence of self-reported baseline DEP and ANX was 13.1% and 8.3%, respectively.”
  • Research suggests that direct-acting antiviral agents do not seem to be associated with treatment-induced depression or anxiety in patients with hepatitis C virus.

    “However, when comparing the prevalence rates of DEP and ANX between INF and direct-acting antiviral agents in patients with HCV, research suggests that direct-acting antiviral agents do not seem to be associated with treatment-inducted DEP or ANX.[21]”
  • Gallach and colleagues showed the prevalence of self-reported baseline anxiety was 8.3%.

    “Gallach and colleagues showed that the prevalence of self-reported baseline DEP and ANX was 13.1% and 8.3%, respectively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallach, M., Vergara, M., da Costa, J. P., Miquel, M., Casas, M., Sanchez-Delgado, J., Dalmau, B., Rudi, N., Parra, I., Monllor, T., Sanchez-Lloansí, M., Dosal, A., Valero, O., & Calvet, X.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Gallach, Marta
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-12-19
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
e0208112
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904274952
Cited by
32
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
direct-acting antivirals, chronic hepatitis C, anxiety, depression, psychiatric comorbidity, psychiatric treatment, sustained virological response, treatment safety, advanced fibrosis, liver cirrhosis
MeSH terms
Sustained Virologic Response, Patient Health Questionnaire, Aged, Antiviral Agents, Anxiety, Mental Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Comorbidity, Hepacivirus, Hepatitis C, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review