Cited by 22Prion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsImmune Response and Inflammation

Toll-like receptor 2 confers partial neuroprotection during prion disease

Open access
Carroll, James A., Race, Brent, Williams, Katie, Chesebro, Bruce·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration are common during prion infection, but the mechanisms that underlie these pathological features are not well understood. Several components of innate immunity, such as Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and Complement C1q, have been shown to influence prion disease. To identify additional components of innate immunity that might impact prion disease within the central nervous system (CNS), we screened RNA from brains of pre-clinical and clinical 22L-infected mice for alterations in genes associated with innate immunity. Transcription of several genes encoding damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) proteins and receptors were increased in the brains of prion-infected mice. To investigate the role of some of these proteins in prion disease of the CNS, we infected mice deficient in DAMP receptor genes Tlr2, C3ar1, and C5ar1 with 22L scrapie. Elimination of TLR2 accelerated disease by a median of 10 days, while lack of C3aR1 or C5aR1 had no effect on disease tempo. Histopathologically, all knockout mouse strains tested were similar to infected control mice in gliosis, vacuolation, and PrPSc deposition. Analysis of proinflammatory markers in the brains of infected knockout mice indicated only a few alterations in gene expression suggesting that C5aR1 and TLR2 signaling did not act synergistically in the brains of prion-infected mice. These results indicate that signaling through TLR2 confers partial neuroprotection during prion infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0208559

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depletion of DAMP receptor genes Tlr2, C3ar1, and C5ar1 in a prion mouse model only leads to slightly increased survival in the Tlr2 model, while C3ar1 and C5ar1 do not influence prion disease course.

    “Interestingly, depletion of any of the DAMP receptor genes Tlr2, C3ar1, and C5ar1 in a prion mouse model only led to a slightly increased survival in the Tlr2-model, while C3ar1, and C5ar1 did not influence prion disease course [82].”

    From Loss of Homeostatic Microglia Signature in Prion Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

  • Transcription of several genes encoding DAMP proteins and receptors such as Toll-like receptors or proteins of the complement cascade is increased in the brains of prion-infected mice.

    “In addition to the upregulation of PAMPs in prion diseases, the transcription of several genes encoding damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) proteins and receptors such as Toll-like receptors or proteins of the complement cascade are also increased in the brains of prion-infected mice [70,82].”

    From Loss of Homeostatic Microglia Signature in Prion Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carroll, J. A., Race, B., Williams, K., & Chesebro, B.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Carroll, James A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-12-31
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
e0208559
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906803945
Cited by
22
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1ZIAAI000937-14)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
TLR2, prion disease, scrapie, neuroprotection, innate immunity, damage-associated molecular patterns, C3AR1, C5aR1, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, knockout mice, pro-inflammatory gene expression, prion protein deposition
MeSH terms
Neuroprotection, Anaphylatoxins, Animals, Brain, Complement System Proteins, Disease Susceptibility, Immunity, Innate, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, Complement, RNA, Severity of Illness Index, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression, Cytokines, Prion Diseases, Mice, Knockout, Chemokines, Receptor, Anaphylatoxin C5a, Toll-Like Receptor 2, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review