Cited by 36Impact of Technology on AdolescentsStudent Stress and CopingMental Health Research Topics

High perceived stress and social interaction behaviour among young adults. A study based on objective measures of face-to-face and smartphone interactions

Open access
Dissing, Agnete Skovlund, Jørgensen, Tobias Bornakke, Gerds, Thomas Alexander, Rod, Naja Hulvej, Lund, Rikke·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Stress and mental health problems impede social functioning and may also complicate relationship formation with peers. The aim was to investigate whether high perceived stress among young adults is associated with social interaction behaviour both via face-to-face interaction and via smartphone interaction. The data was derived from the Copenhagen Network Study, where 535 first-year students (mean age 21.3, 77% male) self-reported on perceived stress at baseline and were subsequently followed for three months with continuous Bluetooth recordings of face-to-face interactions and smartphone interactions (calls and texts) measuring the network size, frequency, and duration of interactions. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between perceived stress (high/low) and social interactions adjusting for sex, age, and personality traits. Participants with high perceived stress were more likely to engage in a larger call and text network and have a higher call and text frequency compared to individuals with low perceived stress. We found a non-statistically significant tendency that participants with a high perceived stress level spend less time meeting face to face with peers. Stressed students engage in frequent smartphone interaction which may be explained by a social support seeking behaviour, or it may be that accommodating a large network via the smartphone is stress-inducing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0218429

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Matthews G, Deary IJ, Whiteman MC. Personality traits 3 ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dissing, A. S., Jørgensen, T. B., Gerds, T. A., Rod, N. H., & Lund, R.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Dissing, Agnete Skovlund
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-07-26
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
e0218429
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964658512
Cited by
36
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
perceived stress, young adults, face-to-face interaction, smartphone interaction, social network size, peer relationships, social support seeking, first-year students, mental health
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult, Text Messaging, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review