Cited by 32Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeology and Historical StudiesBiblical Studies and Interpretation

Radiocarbon dating and microarchaeology untangle the history of Jerusalem's Temple Mount: A view from Wilson's Arch

Open access
Regev, Johanna, Uziel, Joe, Lieberman, Tehillah, Solomon, Avi, Gadot, Yuval, Ben-Ami, Doron, Regev, Lior, Boaretto, Elisabetta·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Radiocarbon dating is rarely applied in Classical and Post-Classical periods in the Eastern Mediterranean, as it is not considered precise enough to solve specific chronological questions, often causing the attribution of historic monuments to be based on circumstantial evidence. This research, applied in Jerusalem, presents a novel approach to solve this problem. Integrating fieldwork, stratigraphy, and microarchaeology analyses with intense radiocarbon dating of charred remains in building materials beneath Wilson's Arch, we absolutely dated monumental structures to very narrow windows of time-even to specific rulers. Wilson's Arch was initiated by Herod the Great and enlarged during the Roman Procurators, such as Pontius Pilatus, in a range of 70 years, rather than 700 years, as previously discussed by scholars. The theater-like structure is dated to the days of Emperor Hadrian and left unfinished before 132-136 AD. Through this approach, it is possible to solve archaeological riddles in intensely urban environments in the historical periods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0233307

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All samples for radiocarbon dating were collected in the field for chronology-building purposes, combined with microarchaeological analyses of sediments as part of context in situ verification.

    “All the samples for radiocarbon dating were collected in the field for chronology-building purposes, combined with microarchaeological analyses of sediments as part of context in situ verification (15, 16, 22, 23, 66, 67).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Bernabei M, Bontadi J. Dendrochronological analysis of the timber structure of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. J Cult Herit. 2012; 13: 54– 60. 10.1016/j.culher.2012.10.002 · DOI
  2. [2]Lorentzen B, Manning SW, Cvikel D, Kahanov Y. High-precision dating the Akko 1 shipwreck, Israel: wiggle-matching the life and death of a ship into the historical record. J Archaeol Sci. 2014; 41: 772– 783. 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.013 · DOI
  3. [3]Pearson CL, Griggs CB, Kuniholm PI, Brewer PW, Wa T, Zny _, et al Dendroarchaeology of the mid-first millennium AD in Constantinople. J Archaeol Sci. 2012; 39: 3402– 3414. 10.1016/j.jas.2012.05.024 · DOI
  4. [4]Kloner A. The Dating of the Southern Decumanus of Aelia Capitolina. In: Baruch E, Greenhut Z, Faust A, editors. New Studies on Jerusalem 11. Ramat Gan; 2006. pp. 239–247.
  5. [5]Onn A, Weksler-Bdolah S, Bar-Nathan R. Jerusalem, The Old City, Wilson’s Arch and the Great Causeway. Hadashot Arkheologiyot Excav Surv Isr. 2011; 123 Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26595086.pdf
  6. [7]Boaretto E. Radiocarbon and the Archaeological Record: An Integrative Approach for Building an Absolute Chronology for the Late Bronze and Iron Ages of Israel. Radiocarbon. 2015; 57: 207– 216. 10.2458/azu_rc.57.18554 · DOI
  7. [8]Weiner S. Microarchaeology: Beyond the Visible Archaeological Record. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  8. [9]Rebollo NR, Cohen-Ofri I, Popovitz-Biro R, Bar-Yosef O, Meignen L, Goldberg P, et al Structural Characterization of Charcoal Exposed to High and Low pH: Implications for 14C Sample Preparation and Charcoal Preservation. Radiocarbon. 2008; 50: 289– 307. Available: 10.1017/S0033822200033592 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Berna F, Behar A, Shahack-Gross R, Berg J, Boaretto E, Gilboa A, et al Sediments exposed to high temperatures: reconstructing pyrotechnological processes in Late Bronze and Iron Age Strata at Tel Dor (Israel). J Archaeol Sci. 2007; 34: 358– 373. 10.1016/J.JAS.2006.05.011 · DOI
  10. [11]Regev L, Poduska KM, Addadi L, Weiner S, Boaretto E. Distinguishing between calcites formed by different mechanisms using infrared spectrometry: archaeological applications. J Archaeol Sci. 2010; 37: 3022– 3029. 10.1016/J.JAS.2010.06.027 · DOI
  11. [12]Yizhaq M, Mintz G, Cohen I, Khalaily H, Weiner S, Boaretto E. Quality Controlled Radiocarbon Dating of Bones and Charcoal from the Early Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) of Motza (Israel). Radiocarbon. 2005; 47: 193– 206. 10.1017/S003382220001969X · DOI · Paper page
  12. [13]Regev L, Steier P, Shachar Y, Mintz E, Wild EM, Kutschera W, et al D-REAMS: A New Compact AMS System for Radiocarbon Measurements at the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Radiocarbon. 2017; 59: 775– 784. 10.1017/RDC.2016.96 · DOI
  13. [14]Bronk Ramsey C. Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates. Radiocarbon. 2009; 51: 337– 360. 10.2458/azu_js_rc.v51i1.3494 · DOI
  14. [15]Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, et al IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon. 2013; 55: 1869– 1887. 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [16]Bronk Ramsey C. Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon. 2009; 51: 1023– 1045. Available: 10.1017/S0033822200034093 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [18]Uziel J, Lieberman T, Solomon A. The Excavations beneath Wilson’s Arch: New light on Roman period Jerusalem. Tel Aviv. 2019; 46: 237– 266.
  17. [19]Shukron E. Did Herod Build the Foundations of the Western Wall? In: Meiron E, editor. City of David: Studies of Ancient Jerusalem 7. Jerusalem; 2012. pp. 13–28.
  18. [20]Szanton N, Hagbi M, Haber M, Uziel J, Ariel D. Monumental Building Projects in Jerusalem in the Days of Pontius Pilate: A Numismatic View from the Stepped Street in the Tyropoeon Valley. In: Steibel G, Uziel J, Cytryn-Silverman K, Re’em A, Gadot Y, editors. New Studies in the Archaeology of Jerusalem and its Region 10. Jerusalem; 2016. pp. 99–114.
  19. [22]Reich R, Baruch Y. On Expansion of the Temple Mount in the Late Second Temple Period. Cathedra (Hebrew). 2017; 164: 7– 24.
  20. [23]Szanton N, Hagbi M, Uziel J, Ariel DT. Pontius Pilate in Jerusalem: The Monumental Street from the Siloam Pool to the Temple Mount. Tel Aviv. 2019; 46: 147– 166. 10.1080/03344355.2019.1650491 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Regev, J., Uziel, J., Lieberman, T., Solomon, A., Gadot, Y., Ben-Ami, D., Regev, L., & Boaretto, E.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Israel Antiquities Authority (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Boaretto, Elisabetta
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
e0233307
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030747573
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Israel Science Foundation (1873/17)
  • the Exilarch’s Foundation for the Dangoor Research Accelerator Mass Spectrometer (D-REAMS)
  • Kimmel Center for Archaeological Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Temple Mount, Jerusalem, microarchaeology, Herod the Great, Roman procurators, Emperor Hadrian, construction chronology, urban archaeology
MeSH terms
Archaeology, Bayes Theorem, Construction Materials, Facility Design and Construction, Humans, Israel, History, Ancient, Radiometric Dating, Construction Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review