The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To describe how men and women divided childcare and housework demands during the height of the first Covid-19 lockdown in the UK, and whether these divisions were associated with worsening mental health during the pandemic. Background: School closures and homeworking during the Covid-19 crisis have resulted in an immediate increase in unpaid care work, which draws new attention to gender inequality in divisions of unpaid care work. Methods: Data come from the wave 9 (2017–19) of Understanding Society and the following April (n = 15,426) and May (n = 14,150) waves of Understanding Society Covid-19 study. Psychological distress was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) at both before and during the lockdown, and unpaid care work was measured during the lockdown. Linear regression models were used. Results: Women spent much more time on unpaid care work than men during lockdown, and it was more likely to be the mother than the father who reduced working hours or changed employment schedules due to increased time on childcare. Women who spent long hours on housework and childcare were more likely to report increased levels of psychological distress. Working parents who adapted their work patterns increased more psychological distress than those who did not. This association was much stronger if he or she was the only member in the household who adapted their work patterns, or if she was a lone mother. Fathers increased more psychological distress if they reduced work hours but she did not, compared to neither reducing work hours. Conclusion: There are continued gender inequalities in divisions of unpaid care work. Juggling home working with homeschooling and childcare as well as extra housework is likely to lead to poor mental health for people with families, particularly for lone mothers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258214 · Cited by 6,427
The sociological study of stress
Pearlin, L. I. (1989) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136956 · Cited by 3,263 · cited 1×
“Role strain theory has been widely used to explain how the potentially competing demands of unpaid care work and employment responsibilities may be related to mental health [12].”
BackgroundGrzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//1076-8998.5.1.111 · Cited by 1,966
Blundell, R., Costa Dias, M., Joyce, R., & Xu, X. (2020) · Fiscal Studies · doi:10.1111/1475-5890.12232 · Cited by 863
(2014) · doi:10.5271/sjweh.3388 · Cited by 648
Work–Family Spillover and Daily Reports of Work and Family Stress in the Adult Labor Force*
Grzywacz, J. G., Almeida, D. M., & McDonald, D. A. (2002) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00028.x · Cited by 493
Bird, C. E. (1999) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2676377 · Cited by 362
KINNUNEN, U., FELDT, T., GEURTS, S., & PULKKINEN, L. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x · Cited by 337
Virtanen, M., Ferrie, J. E., Singh-Manoux, A., Shipley, M. J., Stansfeld, S. A., Marmot, M. G., Ahola, K., Vahtera, J., & Kivimäki, M. (2011) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711000171 · Cited by 317
Long working hours and sleep disturbances: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study
Virtanen, M., Ferrie, J. E., Gimeno, D., Vahtera, J., Elovainio, M., Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G., & Kivimäki, M. (2009) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/32.6.737 · Cited by 316 · cited 1×
“This may lead to long days, reduced sleep and time for rest or relaxation [30, 31], lack of physical exercise, feelings of loneliness and being overwhelmed by trying to meet work deadlines alongside family responsibilities, ultimately leading to psychological distressed [32].”
Background
Cited by
Unequal pandemic, fairer recovery: The COVID-19 impact inquiry report
Suleman, M., Sonthalia, S., Webb, C., Tinson, A., Kane, M., Bunbury, S., Finch, D., & Bibby, J. (2021) · doi:10.37829/hf-2021-hl12 · Cited by 84
Eaton, A. A., Ramjee, D., & Saunders, J. F. (2023) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2021.2022057 · Cited by 40
Whitaker, L., Cameron, C., Hauari, H., Hollingworth, K., & O'Brien, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.725823 · Cited by 17
Wandschneider, L., Batram-Zantvoort, S., Alaze, A., Niehues, V., Spallek, J., Razum, O., & Miani, C. (2022) · Women's Health · doi:10.1177/17455057221114274 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, B., & McMunn, A.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2021-03-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0247959
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3134895645
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 80.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0247959
- The paper
- Xue, B., & McMunn, A. (2021). Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.