Cited by 10Pneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsHealthcare Quality and ManagementGlobal Maternal and Child Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxygen systems and quality of care for children with pneumonia, malaria and diarrhoea: Analysis of a stepped-wedge trial in Nigeria

Open access

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of improved hospital oxygen systems on quality of care (QOC) for children with severe pneumonia, severe malaria, and diarrhoea with severe dehydration. Design: Stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (unblinded), randomised at hospital-level. Setting: 12 hospitals in south-west Nigeria. Participants: 7,141 children (aged 28 days to 14 years) admitted with severe pneumonia, severe malaria or diarrhoea with severe dehydration between January 2014 and October 2017. Interventions: Phase 1 (pulse oximetry) introduced pulse oximetry for all admitted children. Phase 2 (full oxygen system) (i) standardised oxygen equipment package, (ii) clinical education and support, (iii) technical training and support, and (iv) infrastructure and systems support. Outcome measures: We used quantitative QOC scores evaluating assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring practices against World Health Organization and Nigerian standards. We evaluated mean differences in QOC scores between study periods (baseline, oximetry, full oxygen system), using mixed-effects linear regression. Results: 7,141 eligible participants; 6,893 (96.5%) had adequate data for analysis. Mean paediatric QOC score (maximum 6) increased from 1.64 to 3.00 (adjusted mean difference 1.39; 95% CI 1.08–1.69, p<0.001) for severe pneumonia and 2.81 to 4.04 (aMD 1.53; 95% CI 1.23–1.83, p<0.001) for severe malaria, comparing the full intervention to baseline, but did not change for diarrhoea with severe dehydration (aMD -0.12; 95% CI -0.46–0.23, p = 0.501). After excluding practices directly related to pulse oximetry and oxygen, we found aMD 0.23 for severe pneumonia (95% CI -0.02–0.48, p = 0.072) and 0.65 for severe malaria (95% CI 0.41–0.89, p<0.001) comparing full intervention to baseline. Sub-analysis showed some improvements (and no deterioration) in care processes not directly related to oxygen or pulse oximetry. Conclusion: Improvements in hospital oxygen systems were associated with higher QOC scores, attributable to better use of pulse oximetry and oxygen as well as broader improvements in clinical care, with no negative distortions in care practices. Trial registration: ACTRN12617000341325

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0254229

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies aimed to assess the impact of interventions on patients' quality of life and satisfaction with healthcare services.

    “Some studies aimed to assess the impact of interventions on patients' quality of life and satisfaction with healthcare services (57, 58).”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Methods > Outcomes section (page unavailable) says this study focused on care-process outcomes, with a primary measure of quality-of-care scores drawn from case notes. Those scores assess clinical assessment, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring—not patients’ quality of life or satisfaction with healthcare services. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Graham et al. (2021) chose the stepped wedge design to allow all clusters to eventually receive potentially beneficial intervention while enabling rigorous evaluation, and because it is efficient and pragmatic.

    “The stepped wedge design was chosen as it allows all clusters to eventually receive potentially beneficial intervention while enabling a rigorous evaluation of its effectiveness. This design is efficient and pragmatic, enabling the logistics of implementation to be managed effectively”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Methods (Study design; page unavailable) say the full oxygen system was introduced in stages to all 12 hospitals. The Discussion (Limitations; page unavailable) says the design was useful for evaluating outcome changes and flexible enough to incorporate implementation learning. The paper does not say these were the reasons the design was chosen, or describe it as efficient and pragmatic for managing implementation logistics. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Graham et al. (2021) randomly allocated hospitals to receive the full oxygen system at pre-specified dates using a computer-based random sequence generator.

    “Hospitals were randomly allocated to receive the full oxygen system at pre-specified dates using a computer-based random sequence generator”
  • Graham et al. (2021) used 12 steps in the intervention rollout, with the full oxygen system introduced in steps 7-12.

    “The intervention rollout involved 12 steps, with the full oxygen system being introduced in steps 7–12”
  • Graham et al. (2021) had a duration of 4 months between steps.

    “4 months”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. The World Health Organization, 2013, Executive summary: ending preventable child deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea by 2025: the integrated global action plan for pneumonia and diarrhoea (GAPPD)
  2. AZ Gray, 2017, Improved oxygen systems in district hospitals in Lao PDR: A prospective field trial of the impact on outcomes, BMJ Paediatrics Open, 1
  3. WHO and Maternal and Child Epidemiology Estimation Group (MCEE), 2015, UNICEF Data: Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women: Cause of death
  4. R Subhi, 2008, Oxygen systems in health facilities with limited resources: A Trial in Papua New Guinea
  5. WHO, 2016, Oxygen therapy for children
  6. WHO, 2015, WHO Medical Device Technical Series
  7. WHO, 2013, Pocket Book of Hospital care for children: guidelines for the management of common childhood illnesses
  8. MD Merrill, 2009, Instructional Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base
  9. A Bandura, 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory
  10. E Obidike, 2018, Misdiagnosis of pneumonia, bronchiolitis and reactive airway disease in children: A retrospective case review series in South East, Nigeria, Current Pediatric Research, 22
  11. A Donabedian, 1988, The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed?, Jama, 1743, 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Graham, H. R., Maher, J., Bakare, A. A., Nguyen, C. D., Ayede, A. I., Oyewole, O. B., Gray, A., Izadnegahdar, R., Duke, T., & Falade, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • University College Hospital, Ibadan (NG)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • Gates Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Graham, Hamish R.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-07-08
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
e0254229
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177542554
Cited by
8
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
quality of care, pediatric intensive care, severe pneumonia, severe malaria, pulse oximetry, hospital facilities, pediatric hospital admissions, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Female, Hospitals, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Malaria, Male, Nigeria, Oximetry, Oxygen, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Pneumonia, Quality of Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review