Cited by 51Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Telehealth at scale can improve chronic disease management in the community during a pandemic: an experience at the time of COVID-19

Open access
Omboni, Stefano, Ballatore, Tommaso, Rizzi, Franco, Tomassini, Fernanda, Panzeri, Edoardo, Campolo, Luca·2021·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth became a vital resource to contain the virus's spread and ensure continuity of care of patients with a chronic condition, notably arterial hypertension and heart disease. This paper reports the experience based on a telehealth platform used at scale to manage chronic disease patients in the Italian community. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patients' health status was remotely monitored through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), resting or ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG), spirometry, sleep oximetry, and cardiorespiratory polysomnography performed in community pharmacies or general practitioners' offices. Patients also monitored their blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), body temperature, body weight, waist circumference, blood glucose, and lipids at home through a dedicated smartphone app. All data conveyed to the web-based telehealth platform were used to manage critical patients by doctors promptly. Data were analyzed and compared across three consecutive periods of 2 months each: i) before the national lockdown, ii) during the lockdown (from March 9 to May 17, 2020), and iii) after the end of the containment measures. Overall, 13,613 patients visited community pharmacies or doctors' offices. The number of overall tests dropped during and rose after the lockdown. The overall proportion of abnormal tests was larger during the outbreak. A significant increase in the prevalence of abnormal ECGs due to myocardial ischemia, contrasted by a significantly improved BP control, was observed. The number of home users and readings exchanged increased during the pandemic. In 226 patients, a significant increase in the proportion of SpO2 readings and a significant reduction in the entries for all other parameters, except BP, was observed. The proportion of abnormal SpO2 and BP values was significantly lower during the lockdown. Following the lockdown, the proportion of abnormal body weight or waist circumference values increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results support the usefulness of a telehealth solution to detect deterioration of the health status during the COVID-19 pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov at number NCT03781401.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0258015

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glucometers and CGMs demonstrated a symmetrical distribution between workflow and literacy challenges, illustrating the dual burden of learning invasive or semi-invasive peripheral operation alongside data-logging routines.

    “Glucometers and CGMs demonstrated a symmetrical distribution between workflow and literacy challenges [2,4], illustrating the dual burden of learning invasive or semi-invasive peripheral operation alongside data-logging routines.”

    From Clinical Efficacy and Patient Adherence Hurdles of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Frameworks in Managing Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Materials and methods section (page not provided) lists glucometers among home devices and says patients manually entered readings in an app. The Discussion notes that manual entry may have limited app use among older patients. Neither passage reports CGMs, a symmetrical distribution of workflow and literacy challenges, or difficulties learning invasive device operation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The clinical value proposition of RPM systems is well-documented; systematically tracking physiological metrics allows for early detection of clinical deterioration, optimization of pharmacological regimens, and reduction of emergency department utilization.

    “The clinical value proposition of these systems is well-documented; systematically tracking physiological metrics allows for the early detection of clinical deterioration, optimization of pharmacological regimens, and reduction of emergency department utilization [2,4].”

    From Clinical Efficacy and Patient Adherence Hurdles of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Frameworks in Managing Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Office ESoCP. Social isolation during COVID-19 pandemic linked with high blood pressure 2020 [13/09/2021]. https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/social-isolation-during-covid-19-pandemic-linked-with-high-blood-pressure.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omboni, S., Ballatore, T., Rizzi, F., Tomassini, F., Panzeri, E., & Campolo, L.
Affiliations
  • Sechenov University (RU)
  • Italian Institute of Telemedicine (IT)
Corresponding author
Omboni, Stefano
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2021-09-29
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
e0258015
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203873265
Cited by
51
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
telemedicine, chronic disease management, COVID-19 pandemic, hypertension, heart disease, remote patient monitoring, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, electrocardiogram, community pharmacy, home monitoring, mobile application, oxygen saturation, electrocardiographic abnormalities, myocardial ischemia, blood pressure control, lockdown, continuity of care
MeSH terms
Physical Distancing, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Chronic Disease, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Telemedicine, Disease Management, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review