Cited by 107Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisDiabetes Management and Research

Prevalence and healthcare costs of diabetic retinopathy: a population-based register study in Sweden

Open access
Heintz, E., Wiréhn, A.-B., Peebo, B. Bourghardt, Rosenqvist, U., Levin, L.-Å.·2010·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis The aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence and healthcare costs of diabetic retinopathy (DR).Methods This population-based study included all residents (n = 251,386) in the catchment area of the eye clinic of Linköping University Hospital, Sweden. Among patients with diabetes (n = 12,026), those with and without DR were identified through register data from both the Care Data Warehouse in Ostergötland, an administrative healthcare register, and the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Healthcare cost data were elicited by record linkage of these two registers to data for the year 2008 in the Cost Per Patient Database developed by Ostergötland County Council.Results The prevalence of any DR was 41.8% (95% CI 38.9-44.6) for patients with type 1 diabetes and 27.9% (27.1-28.7) for patients with type 2 diabetes. Sight-threatening DR was present in 12.1% (10.2-14.0) and 5.0% (4.6-5.4) of the type 1 and type 2 diabetes populations respectively. The annual average healthcare cost of any DR was euro72 (euro53-91). Stratified into background retinopathy, proliferative DR, maculopathy, and the last two conditions combined, the costs were euro26 (euro10-42), euro257 (euro155-359), euro216 (euro113-318) and euro433 (euro232-635) respectively. The annual cost for DR was euro106,000 per 100,000 inhabitants.Conclusions This study presents new information on the prevalence and costs of DR. Approximately one-third of patients with diabetes have some form of DR. Average healthcare costs increase considerably with the severity of DR, which suggests that preventing progression of DR may lower healthcare costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-010-1836-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eight studies did not distinguish between costs of different conditions.

    “Of note, eight studies [47–53, 59] did not distinguish between costs of different conditions, further hindering the interpretation.”

    From The economic impact of retinal diseases for which gene therapy is emerging: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Cost estimates section says the study estimated costs separately for four diabetic-retinopathy severity levels. Table 3 and the Discussion report distinct costs for background retinopathy, proliferative retinopathy, maculopathy, and their combination. Thus, this cited study did distinguish costs among the conditions it examined; our copy cannot establish what the other seven studies did. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Costs associated with DMO were described in six studies for Spain (n = 2), Hungary, Italy, Sweden and the UK.

    “Costs associated with DMO were described in six studies for Spain (n = 2) [55, 57], Hungary [54], Italy [56], Sweden [52] and the UK [58].”

    From The economic impact of retinal diseases for which gene therapy is emerging: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results report Swedish healthcare costs for diabetic maculopathy, and the Discussion compares those costs with studies of macular oedema. The paper does not identify its maculopathy category specifically as diabetic macular oedema (DMO), so it supports the Swedish cost-study citation but not that narrower description without qualification. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Annual direct medical costs ranged from $45 to $613 in NPDR patients and from $441 to $3,031 in PDR patients.

    “Annual direct medical costs ranged from $45 to $613 in NPDR patients and from $441 to $3,031 in PDR patients (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 6), suggesting direct medical costs associated with PDR were about 5.8 times higher than those associated with NPDR.”

    From The economic impact of retinal diseases for which gene therapy is emerging: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results and Table 3 report annual additional healthcare costs by retinopathy severity, including €26 per patient for background retinopathy and €257 for PDR. They do not report the claimed NPDR and PDR dollar ranges; the Cost estimates section says this study converted costs to euros. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Direct medical costs associated with PDR were about 5.8 times higher than those associated with NPDR.

    “Annual direct medical costs ranged from $45 to $613 in NPDR patients and from $441 to $3,031 in PDR patients (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 6), suggesting direct medical costs associated with PDR were about 5.8 times higher than those associated with NPDR.”

    From The economic impact of retinal diseases for which gene therapy is emerging: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    Table 3 and the Discussion report higher annual additional healthcare costs for PDR (€257) than for background retinopathy (€26). But the paper does not report a 5.8-fold PDR-to-NPDR comparison: its reported figures for PDR and background retinopathy yield about 9.9-fold, and it does not label the latter category NPDR. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among the four studies reporting direct medical costs at the patient level for DMO, estimates ranged from $370 to $14,642 per annum.

    “Among the four studies reporting direct medical costs at the patient level, estimates ranged from $370 to $14,642 per annum [52, 54, 55, 57] (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table 7).”

    From The economic impact of retinal diseases for which gene therapy is emerging: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results report annual patient-level healthcare costs for maculopathy, including €216 per patient, and the Cost estimates section defines the included medical costs. The paper does not report the stated $370–$14,642 range or establish the costs from all four cited studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heintz, E., Wiréhn, A.-B., Peebo, B. B., Rosenqvist, U., & Levin, L.-Å.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Ryhov Hospital Jönköping (SE)
  • Lasarettet i Motala (SE)
Corresponding author
Heintz, E.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2010-07-02
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
2147-2154
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1996708310
Cited by
107
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Länsstyrelsen Östergötland
  • Linköpings Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, prevalence, health care costs, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic maculopathy, background retinopathy, retinopathy severity, cost per patient, Östergötland
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Humans, Male, Registries, Sweden, Prevalence, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review