The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Fittest versus the Flattest: Experimental Confirmation of the Quasispecies Effect with Subviral Pathogens
Open accessAbstract
The "survival of the fittest" is the paradigm of Darwinian evolution in which the best-adapted replicators are favored by natural selection. However, at high mutation rates, the fittest organisms are not necessarily the fastest replicators but rather are those that show the greatest robustness against deleterious mutational effects, even at the cost of a low replication rate. This scenario, dubbed the "survival of the flattest", has so far only been shown to operate in digital organisms. We show that "survival of the flattest" can also occur in biological entities by analyzing the outcome of competition between two viroid species coinfecting the same plant. Under optimal growth conditions, a viroid species characterized by fast population growth and genetic homogeneity outcompeted a viroid species with slow population growth and a high degree of variation. In contrast, the slow-growth species was able to outcompete the fast species when the mutation rate was increased. These experimental results were supported by an in silico model of competing viroid quasispecies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules
Eigen, M. (1971) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00623322 · Cited by 3,788
Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes
Krakauer, D. C., & Plotkin, J. B. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.032668599 · Cited by 254
SELECTION FOR FITNESS VERSUS SELECTION FOR ROBUSTNESS IN RNA SECONDARY STRUCTURE FOLDING
Wilke, C. O. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00756.x · Cited by 76
Cited by
Domingo, E., Sheldon, J., & Perales, C. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05023-11 · Cited by 1,009
Quasispecies Theory and the Behavior of RNA Viruses
Lauring, A. S., & Andino, R. (2010) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001005 · Cited by 846
Spatiotemporal microbial evolution on antibiotic landscapes
Baym, M., Lieberman, T. D., Kelsic, E. D., Chait, R., Gross, R., Yelin, I., & Kishony, R. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag0822 · Cited by 538
Selection for Robustness in Mutagenized RNA Viruses
Sanjuán, R., Cuevas, J. M., Furió, V., Holmes, E. C., & Moya, A. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030093 · Cited by 366
Domingo, E., & Perales, C. (2019) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008271 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Codoñer, F. M., Darós, J.-A., Solé, R. V., & Elena, S. F.
- Venue
- PLoS Pathogens
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e136
- ISSN
- 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7374
- OpenAlex
- W2094339562
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Fittest versus the Flattest: Experimental Confirmation of the Quasispecies Effect with Subviral Pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020136
- The paper
- Codoñer, F. M., Darós, J.-A., Solé, R. V., & Elena, S. F. (2006). The Fittest versus the Flattest: Experimental Confirmation of the Quasispecies Effect with Subviral Pathogens. PLoS Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.