Cited by 380Hepatitis C virus researchCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Synergistic reversal of intrahepatic HCV-specific CD8 T cell exhaustion by combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade

Open access
Nakamoto, Nobuhiro, Cho, Hyosun, Shaked, Abraham, Olthoff, Kim, Valiga, Mary E., Kaminski, Mary, Gostick, Emma, Price, David A. +3 more·2009·PLoS Pathogens

Abstract

Viral persistence is associated with hierarchical antiviral CD8 T cell exhaustion with increased programmed death-1 (PD-1) expression. In HCV persistence, HCV-specific CD8 T cells from the liver (the site of viral replication) display increased PD-1 expression and a profound functional impairment that is not reversed by PD-1 blockade alone. Here, we report that the inhibitory receptor cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is preferentially upregulated in PD-1(+) T cells from the liver but not blood of chronically HCV-infected patients. PD-1/CTLA-4 co-expression in intrahepatic T cells was associated with a profound HCV-specific effector dysfunction that was synergistically reversed by combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade in vitro, but not by blocking PD-1 or CTLA-4 alone. A similar effect was observed in circulating HCV-specific CD8 T cells with increased PD-1/CTLA-4 co-expression during acute hepatitis C. The functional response to combined blockade was directly associated with CTLA-4 expression, lost with CD28-depletion and CD4-independent (including CD4(+)FoxP3(+) Tregs). We conclude that PD-1 and CTLA-4 pathways both contribute to virus-specific T cell exhaustion at the site of viral replication by a redundant mechanism that requires combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade to reverse. These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of virus-specific T cell dysfunction, and suggest that the synergistic effect by combined inhibitory receptor blockade might have a therapeutic application against chronic viral infection in vivo, provided that it does not induce autoimmunity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000313

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakamoto, N., Cho, H., Shaked, A., Olthoff, K., Valiga, M. E., Kaminski, M., Gostick, E., Price, D. A., Freeman, G. J., Wherry, E. J., & Chang, K.-M.
Affiliations
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • The Wistar Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Kyong-Mi
Venue
PLoS Pathogens
Published
2009-02-27
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
e1000313
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W2077940506
Cited by
380
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 24
FWCI
22.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Pathogens (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (P30 CA016520)
  • University of Pennsylvania (P30CA016520, M01-RR00040)
  • American Gastroenterological Association
  • Abramson Cancer Center (P30CA016520)
  • National Institutes of Health (AI56299, RR00040, CA016520)
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Cancer Institute (CA016520, P30CA016520)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI047519, AI47519, P01AI056299)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK50306, P30DK050306)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR-00040, M01RR000040)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
hepatitis C virus, CD8+ T cell exhaustion, PD-1, CTLA-4, PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade, intrahepatic T cells, chronic viral infection, T cell dysfunction, regulatory T cells, CD28, acute hepatitis C, antiviral immunity
MeSH terms
Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte, Blood, Female, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Liver, Male, Receptors, Immunologic, Antigens, CD, Chi-Square Distribution, Hepacivirus, Cytokines, CD28 Antigens, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Statistics, Nonparametric, Hepatitis C, Chronic, Hepatocytes, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Inducible T-Cell Co-Stimulator Protein, CTLA-4 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review