Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Staphylococcus epidermidis Strategies to Avoid Killing by Human Neutrophils

Open access
Cheung, Gordon Y. C., Rigby, Kevin, Wang, Rong, Queck, Shu Y., Braughton, Kevin R., Whitney, Adeline R., Teintze, Martin, DeLeo, Frank R., Otto, Michael·2010·PLoS Pathogens

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a leading nosocomial pathogen. In contrast to its more aggressive relative S. aureus, it causes chronic rather than acute infections. In highly virulent S. aureus, phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) contribute significantly to immune evasion and aggressive virulence by their strong ability to lyse human neutrophils. Members of the PSM family are also produced by S. epidermidis, but their role in immune evasion is not known. Notably, strong cytolytic capacity of S. epidermidis PSMs would be at odds with the notion that S. epidermidis is a less aggressive pathogen than S. aureus, prompting us to examine the biological activities of S. epidermidis PSMs. Surprisingly, we found that S. epidermidis has the capacity to produce PSMδ, a potent leukocyte toxin, representing the first potent cytolysin to be identified in that pathogen. However, production of strongly cytolytic PSMs was low in S. epidermidis, explaining its low cytolytic potency. Interestingly, the different approaches of S. epidermidis and S. aureus to causing human disease are thus reflected by the adaptation of biological activities within one family of virulence determinants, the PSMs. Nevertheless, S. epidermidis has the capacity to evade neutrophil killing, a phenomenon we found is partly mediated by resistance mechanisms to antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), including the protease SepA, which degrades AMPs, and the AMP sensor/resistance regulator, Aps (GraRS). These findings establish a significant function of SepA and Aps in S. epidermidis immune evasion and explain in part why S. epidermidis may evade elimination by innate host defense despite the lack of cytolytic toxin expression. Our study shows that the strategy of S. epidermidis to evade elimination by human neutrophils is characterized by a passive defense approach and provides molecular evidence to support the notion that S. epidermidis is a less aggressive pathogen than S. aureus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001133

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Cheung, G. Y. C., Rigby, K., Wang, R., Queck, S. Y., Braughton, K. R., Whitney, A. R., Teintze, M., DeLeo, F. R., & Otto, M.
Venue
PLoS Pathogens
Published
2010-10-07
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
e1001133
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W1965662362
Cited by
214
References
6
FWCI
13.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staphylococcus epidermidis Strategies to Avoid Killing by Human Neutrophils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001133
The paper
Cheung, G. Y. C., Rigby, K., Wang, R., Queck, S. Y., Braughton, K. R., Whitney, A. R., Teintze, M., DeLeo, F. R., & Otto, M. (2010). Staphylococcus epidermidis Strategies to Avoid Killing by Human Neutrophils. PLoS Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001133

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.