The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepascore: An Accurate Validated Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection
Abstract
Background: Staging hepatic fibrosis by liver biopsy guides prognosis and treatment of hepatitis C, but is invasive and expensive. We sought to create an algorithm of serum markers that accurately and reliably predict liver fibrosis stage among hepatitis C patients. Methods: Ten biochemical markers were measured at time of liver biopsy in 117 untreated hepatitis C patients (training set). Multivariate logistic regression and ROC curve analyses were used to create a predictive model for significant fibrosis (METAVIR F2, F3, and F4), advanced fibrosis (F3 and F4), and cirrhosis (F4). The model was validated in 104 patients from other institutions. Results: A model (Hepascore) of bilirubin, γ-glutamyltransferase, hyaluronic acid, α2-macroglobulin, age, and sex produced areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.85, 0.96, and 0.94 for significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, respectively. In the training set, a score ≥0.5 (range, 0.0–1.0) was 92% specific and 67% sensitive for significant fibrosis, a score <0.5 was 81% specific and 95% sensitive for advanced fibrosis, and a score <0.84 was 84% specific and 71% sensitive for cirrhosis. Among the validation set, the AUC for significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.82, 0.90, and 0.89, respectively. A score ≥0.5 provided a specificity and sensitivity of 89% and 63% for significant fibrosis, whereas scores <0.5 had 74% specificity and 88% sensitivity for advanced fibrosis. Conclusions: A model of 4 serum markers plus age and sex provides clinically useful information regarding different fibrosis stages among hepatitis C patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C
Poynard, T., Bedossa, P., & Opolon, P. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07642-8 · Cited by 3,011
Cited by
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
(2015) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006 · Cited by 1,875
Boursier, J., Vergniol, J., Guillet, A., Hiriart, J.-B., Lannes, A., Le Bail, B., Michalak, S., Chermak, F., Bertrais, S., Foucher, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.023 · Cited by 400
Impact of non-invasive biomarkers on hepatology practice: past, present and future
Anstee, Q. M., Castera, L., & Loomba, R. (2022) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.026 · Cited by 224
Applying Non-Invasive Fibrosis Measurements in NAFLD/NASH: Progress to Date
Albhaisi, S., & Sanyal, A. J. (2019) · Pharmaceutical Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40290-019-00305-z · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, L. A., Bulsara, M., Rossi, E., DeBoer, B., Speers, D., George, J., Kench, J., Farrell, G., McCaughan, G. W., & Jeffrey, G. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1867-1873
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2161397885
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepascore: An Accurate Validated Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2005.048389
- The paper
- Adams, L. A., Bulsara, M., Rossi, E., DeBoer, B., Speers, D., George, J., Kench, J., Farrell, G., McCaughan, G. W., & Jeffrey, G. P. (2005). Hepascore: An Accurate Validated Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.048389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.