Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepascore: An Accurate Validated Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection

Adams, Leon A, Bulsara, Max, Rossi, Enrico, DeBoer, Bastiaan, Speers, David, George, Jacob, Kench, James, Farrell, Geoffrey, McCaughan, Geoffrey W, Jeffrey, Gary P·2005·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Staging hepatic fibrosis by liver biopsy guides prognosis and treatment of hepatitis C, but is invasive and expensive. We sought to create an algorithm of serum markers that accurately and reliably predict liver fibrosis stage among hepatitis C patients. Methods: Ten biochemical markers were measured at time of liver biopsy in 117 untreated hepatitis C patients (training set). Multivariate logistic regression and ROC curve analyses were used to create a predictive model for significant fibrosis (METAVIR F2, F3, and F4), advanced fibrosis (F3 and F4), and cirrhosis (F4). The model was validated in 104 patients from other institutions. Results: A model (Hepascore) of bilirubin, γ-glutamyltransferase, hyaluronic acid, α2-macroglobulin, age, and sex produced areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.85, 0.96, and 0.94 for significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, respectively. In the training set, a score ≥0.5 (range, 0.0–1.0) was 92% specific and 67% sensitive for significant fibrosis, a score <0.5 was 81% specific and 95% sensitive for advanced fibrosis, and a score <0.84 was 84% specific and 71% sensitive for cirrhosis. Among the validation set, the AUC for significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.82, 0.90, and 0.89, respectively. A score ≥0.5 provided a specificity and sensitivity of 89% and 63% for significant fibrosis, whereas scores <0.5 had 74% specificity and 88% sensitivity for advanced fibrosis. Conclusions: A model of 4 serum markers plus age and sex provides clinically useful information regarding different fibrosis stages among hepatitis C patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2005.048389

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 539

Metadata

Authors
Adams, L. A., Bulsara, M., Rossi, E., DeBoer, B., Speers, D., George, J., Kench, J., Farrell, G., McCaughan, G. W., & Jeffrey, G. P.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2005-10-01
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
1867-1873
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2161397885
Cited by
539
References
1
FWCI
17.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepascore: An Accurate Validated Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2005.048389
The paper
Adams, L. A., Bulsara, M., Rossi, E., DeBoer, B., Speers, D., George, J., Kench, J., Farrell, G., McCaughan, G. W., & Jeffrey, G. P. (2005). Hepascore: An Accurate Validated Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.048389

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.