Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reference Population and Marathon Runner Sera Assessed by Highly Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T and Commercial Cardiac Troponin T and I Assays

Open access
Mingels, Alma, Jacobs, Leo, Michielsen, Etienne, Swaanenburg, Joost, Wodzig, Will, van Dieijen-Visser, Marja·2009·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Endurance exercise can increase cardiac troponin (cTn) concentrations as high as those seen in cases of minor myocardial infarction. The inability of most cTn assays to reliably quantify cTn at very low concentrations complicates a thorough data analysis, and the clinical implications of such increases remain unclear. The application of recently developed highly sensitive cTn immunoassays may help resolve these problems. Methods: We evaluated the precommercial highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay from Roche Diagnostics and the Architect cardiac troponin I (cTnI-Architect) assay from Abbott Diagnostics by testing samples from a reference population of 546 individuals and a cohort of 85 marathon runners. We also measured the samples with the current commercial cTnT assay for comparison. Results: Although the hs-cTnT and cTnI-Architect assays were capable of measuring cTn concentrations at low concentrations (<0.01 μg/L), only the hs-cTnT assay demonstrated a CV of <10% at the 99th percentile of the reference population and a near-gaussian distribution of the measurements. After a marathon, 86% of the runners had cTnT concentrations greater than the 99th percentile with the hs-cTnT assay, whereas only 45% of the runners showed increased concentrations with the current cTnT assay. cTn concentrations remained significantly increased the day after the marathon. A multiple regression analysis demonstrated marathon experience and age to be significant predictors of postmarathon cTn concentrations (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The hs-cTnT assay was the only assay tested with a performance capability sufficient to detect cTn concentrations in healthy individuals. The number of runners with increased cTn concentrations after a marathon depends highly on an assay’s limit of detection (LOD). The assay with the lowest LOD, the hs-cTnT assay, showed that almost all runners had increased cTn concentrations. The clinical implications of these findings require further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2008.106427

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Mingels, A., Jacobs, L., Michielsen, E., Swaanenburg, J., Wodzig, W., & van Dieijen-Visser, M.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
101-108
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2008149232
Cited by
295
References
37
FWCI
16.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reference Population and Marathon Runner Sera Assessed by Highly Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T and Commercial Cardiac Troponin T and I Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2008.106427
The paper
Mingels, A., Jacobs, L., Michielsen, E., Swaanenburg, J., Wodzig, W., & van Dieijen-Visser, M. (2009). Reference Population and Marathon Runner Sera Assessed by Highly Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T and Commercial Cardiac Troponin T and I Assays. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.106427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.