Cited by 396Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyber-Aggression: Definition and Concept of Cyberbullying

Grigg, Dorothy Wunmi·2010·Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling

Abstract

Abstract This study examined definitions and concepts of cyberbullying. It identified words, terms and definitions used for negative acts on the internet and mobile phones across different age groups in the United Kingdom. Young people and adults' (N = 32; age = 8–54) constructs and perceptions of negative online behaviours were also reported. Focus groups and individual interviews were employed using qualitative triangulation: Thematic Analysis and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The study examined current definitions and concepts of cyberbullying and how these differ in its findings; and considered different ways to foster positive online behaviour for the context of practitioners. The concept of cyber-aggression is used to describe a wide range of behaviours other than cyberbullying. The findings indicate that there is a need to include a broader definition in line with the current trend of a range of behaviours that are common with internet and mobile phone usage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Baron R.A, 1994, Human aggression
  2. Geen R.G, 2001, Human aggression
  3. Menesini E, 2009, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 23
  4. J Pfetsch . (2010 ).Zivilcourage in der Schule. Konzeption und Evaluation eines Zivilcourage-Trainings zur Pravention aggressiven Verhaltens unter Schulern[Civil courage in schools. Development and evaluation of a bystander intervention training for the prevention of aggressive behaviour among students] . Doctoral dissertation, University of Luxembourg.
  5. J Pfetsch, G Steffgen, and A Konig . (2009 , November).Banning solves the problem!? Effects of banning mobile phone use in schools on cyberbullying. Poster presentation at the 14th Workshop Aggression, 2009, Berlin, Germany.
  6. G Steffgen, J Pfetsch, A Konig, and L Bredemus . (2009 ). Cyberbullying among school aged children in Luxembourg . Poster, Abstract inCOST Action IS0801 Workshop Cyberbullying: Definition and measurement(p. 25 ). Vilnius, Lithuania: Mykolas Romeris University Publishing Centre.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–394 of 394

Metadata

Authors
Grigg, D. W.
Affiliations
Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Grigg, Dorothy Wunmi
Venue
Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling
Published
2010-12-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
143-156
ISSN
  • 1037-2911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-2520
OpenAlex
W2033087746
Cited by
396
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, online aggression, mobile phone use, internet use, youth, adults, age differences, practitioner guidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review