Cited by 82Healthcare Quality and ManagementPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPsychiatric care and mental health services

Quality Measures For Mental Health And Substance Use: Gaps, Opportunities, And Challenges

Pincus, Harold Alan, Scholle, Sarah Hudson, Spaeth-Rublee, Brigitta, Hepner, Kimberly A., Brown, Jonathan·2016·Health Affairs

Abstract

Following up on its Crossing the Quality Chasm report, in 2006 the Institute of Medicine issued a report that included sweeping recommendations to improve the quality of behavioral health care in the United States. To date, few of those recommendations have been implemented, and there is little evidence that behavioral health care quality has improved significantly over the past ten years. However, the advent of health care reform, parity of insurance coverage, and growing recognition of the impact of behavioral health disorders on population health and health care costs have created new demands and opportunities for expanded and innovative strategies to assess the quality of care for this patient population. We provide an overview of the current state of quality measurement in behavioral health, identify key priorities for measure development, and describe the most important challenges. We recommend a coordinated plan that would boost investment in developing, evaluating, and implementing behavioral health quality measures; conduct research to develop the evidence necessary to support a more robust set of measures; overcome barriers to the improvement and linking of data sources; and expand efforts to build the capacity of the clinical workforce, in partnership with consumers, to improve quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0027

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quality of mental health care lags well behind that found in physical health care.

    “Quality of mental health care lags well behind that found in physical health care. 212”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [212]

  • Mental health care quality is poor and improves more slowly than general medical care quality.

    “The level of mental health quality of care is poor and the rate of improvement is slow compared to general medical conditions 26 .”
  • Many mental health care quality measures are not linked to existing data sources, which mostly rely on claims data rather than electronic health records or electronically reported patient outcomes.

    “Currently, many mental health care quality measures are not linked to existing data sources, which mostly rely on claims data rather than data derived from electronic health records or electronicallyreported patient outcomes 26,65 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pincus, H. A., Scholle, S. H., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Hepner, K. A., & Brown, J.
Affiliations
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • National Committee for Quality Assurance (US)
  • Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee is a research associate and program manager at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, in New York City.
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Mathematica Policy Research (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2016-06
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1000-1008
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2411284109
Cited by
82
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000040)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
quality metrics, behavioral health services, mental health, substance use disorders, quality of care, measurement development, health care reform, data linkage, consumer involvement, Institute of Medicine recommendations
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health Services, Quality of Health Care, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health Care Reform, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review