Cited by 32Electronic Health Records SystemsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMedical Coding and Health Information

Advancing the adoption, integration and testing of technological advancements within existing care systems

Druss, Benjamin G., Dimitropoulos, Linda·2013·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This manuscript reviews the work on uptake and dissemination of health information technologies in mental health populations and settings, with the goal of informing the future research agenda.Methods We reviewed both the formal and "grey" literature describing the rates and correlates of uptake for electronic health records (EHRs) and personal health records (PHRs) for general and specialty mental health settings.Results Rates of uptake and use of EHRs and PHRs are low in general medical settings, and the limited evidence suggests even lower rates for specialty mental health settings. Many of the patient, provider and system-level characteristics associated with lower rates of use in general populations would be expected to be exacerbated in mental health settings.Conclusions The findings suggest a need to better understand both the causes and strategies for overcoming barriers to uptake of health information technology (HIT) in mental health settings. Observational studies could help to better elucidate the barriers to adoption of HIT that are unique or disproportionate in mental health populations. Implementation science studies are needed to better identify strategies for addressing these barriers and optimizing uptake of mental health HIT interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.012

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some countries with common claims datasets or electronic medical records, mental health care measures have been variably adopted.

    “In some countries with common claims datasets or electronic medical records, mental health care measures have been variably adopted 66,67 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Druss, B. G., & Dimitropoulos, L.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Druss, Benjamin G.
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
345-348
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091913375
Cited by
32
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
health information technology adoption, electronic health records, personal health records, mental health services, technology adoption barriers, implementation science
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Medical Informatics, Mental Health Services, Technology Transfer, Health Records, Personal, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review